These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

106 related items for PubMed ID: 2792582

  • 1. Auditory consonant and word recognition skills of cochlear implant users.
    Tye-Murray N, Tyler RS.
    Ear Hear; 1989 Oct; 10(5):292-8. PubMed ID: 2792582
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS, Kreft HA.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Performance of some of the better cochlear-implant patients.
    Tyler RS, Moore BC, Kuk FK.
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Dec; 32(4):887-911. PubMed ID: 2601319
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Prosodic and segmental aspects of speech perception with the House/3M single-channel implant.
    Rosen S, Walliker J, Brimacombe JA, Edgerton BJ.
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Mar; 32(1):93-111. PubMed ID: 2704206
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Audio-visual consonant recognition with the 3M/House cochlear implant.
    Danhauer JL, Ghadialy FB, Beck DL, Lucks LE, Cudahy EA.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1990 Mar; 27(3):247-54. PubMed ID: 2401956
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Performance of 3M/house cochlear implant users on tests of speech perception.
    Danhauer JL, Ghadialy FB, Eskwitt DL, Mendel LL.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1990 Oct; 1(4):236-9. PubMed ID: 2132608
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Consonant perception by users of Nucleus and Clarion multichannel cochlear implants.
    Doyle KJ, Mills D, Larky J, Kessler D, Luxford WM, Schindler RA.
    Am J Otol; 1995 Sep; 16(5):676-81. PubMed ID: 8588676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Consonant recognition as a function of the number of channels of stimulation by patients who use the Symbion cochlear implant.
    Dorman M, Dankowski K, McCandless G, Smith L.
    Ear Hear; 1989 Oct; 10(5):288-91. PubMed ID: 2792581
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Auditory Perception and Production of Speech Feature Contrasts by Pediatric Implant Users.
    Mahshie J, Core C, Larsen MD.
    Ear Hear; 2015 Oct; 36(6):653-63. PubMed ID: 26035142
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. High-Variability Sentence Recognition in Long-Term Cochlear Implant Users: Associations With Rapid Phonological Coding and Executive Functioning.
    Smith GNL, Pisoni DB, Kronenberger WG.
    Ear Hear; 2019 Oct; 40(5):1149-1161. PubMed ID: 30601227
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Relationships between speech production and speech perception skills in young cochlear-implant users.
    Tye-Murray N, Spencer L, Gilbert-Bedia E.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Nov; 98(5 Pt 1):2454-60. PubMed ID: 7593929
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Performance of adult Ineraid and Nucleus cochlear implant patients after 3.5 years of use.
    Tyler RS, Lowder MW, Parkinson AJ, Woodworth GG, Gantz BJ.
    Audiology; 1995 Nov; 34(3):135-44. PubMed ID: 8561691
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Vowel and consonant recognition with the aid of a multichannel cochlear implant.
    Dorman MF, Dankowski K, McCandless G, Parkin JL, Smith L.
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1991 Aug; 43(3):585-601. PubMed ID: 1775658
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Consonant recognition by some of the better cochlear-implant patients.
    Tyler RS, Moore BC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Dec; 92(6):3068-77. PubMed ID: 1474222
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Relations among different measures of speech reception in subjects using a cochlear implant.
    Rabinowitz WM, Eddington DK, Delhorne LA, Cuneo PA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Oct; 92(4 Pt 1):1869-81. PubMed ID: 1401531
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Vowel and consonant identification tests can be used to compare performances in a multilingual group of cochlear implant patients.
    Pelizzone M, Boëx C, Montandon P.
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1993 Oct; 55(6):341-6. PubMed ID: 8265119
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Acoustic cues for consonant identification by patients who use the Ineraid cochlear implant.
    Dorman MF, Soli S, Dankowski K, Smith LM, McCandless G, Parkin J.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Nov; 88(5):2074-9. PubMed ID: 2269723
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Cochlear implantation in Thailand.
    Vaewvichit K, Luangpitakchumpol P.
    J Laryngol Otol; 1999 Jun; 113(6):515-7. PubMed ID: 10605579
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effects of signal processing by the House-3M cochlear implant on consonant perception.
    Edgerton BJ, Brimacombe JA.
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1984 Jun; 411():115-23. PubMed ID: 6596834
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of the F0F2 and F0F1F2 processing strategies for the Cochlear Corporation cochlear implant.
    Tye-Murray N, Lowder M, Tyler RS.
    Ear Hear; 1990 Jun; 11(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 2358129
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.