These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

313 related items for PubMed ID: 2795564

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
    Gonzalez D, Hernandez E, Anderson L, Heller P, Atkinson BF.
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Atypical squamous cells in Papanicolaou smears.
    Davis GL, Hernandez E, Davis JL, Miyazawa K.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Jan; 69(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 3540762
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Aggressive evaluation for atypical squamous cells in Papanicolaou smears.
    Lindheim SR, Smith-Nguyen G.
    J Reprod Med; 1990 Oct; 35(10):971-3. PubMed ID: 2246766
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Human papillomavirus screening for women with atypical Papanicolaou smears.
    Borst M, Butterworth CE, Baker V, Kuykendall K, Gore H, Soong SJ, Hatch KD.
    J Reprod Med; 1991 Feb; 36(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 1849177
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Inflammatory atypia on cervical smears. A diagnostic dilemma for the gynecologist.
    Busseniers AE, Sidawy MK.
    J Reprod Med; 1991 Feb; 36(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 2010900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Discrepancy of cervical cytology and colposcopic biopsy: is cervical conization necessary?
    McCord ML, Stovall TG, Summitt RL, Ling FW.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 May; 77(5):715-9. PubMed ID: 2014085
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Inflammatory atypia and the false-negative smear in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Frisch LE.
    Acta Cytol; 1987 May; 31(6):873-7. PubMed ID: 3425147
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A comparison of the reliability of repeat cervical smears and colposcopy in patients with abnormal cervical cytology.
    Mayeaux EJ, Harper MB, Abreo F, Pope JB, Phillips GS.
    J Fam Pract; 1995 Jan; 40(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 7807039
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Cervical conization findings in women with dysplastic cervical cytology and normal colposcopy.
    Ramirez EJ, Hernandez E, Miyazawa K.
    J Reprod Med; 1990 Apr; 35(4):359-61. PubMed ID: 2352226
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Preoperative evaluation by colposcopy and cytology in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (cin) (author's transl)].
    Naujoks H, Köpf F, Leber I.
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1979 May; 39(5):372-7. PubMed ID: 456858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Abnormal cervical cytology in pregnancy: a 17-year experience.
    Economos K, Perez Veridiano N, Delke I, Collado ML, Tancer ML.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):915-8. PubMed ID: 8497355
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Koilocytotic atypia and underlying dysplasia.
    Shepherd J, Lynch W.
    J Fam Pract; 1991 Aug; 33(2):168-71. PubMed ID: 1890397
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Atypical cervix uteri smears--consequences?].
    Nielsen MN, Hølund B, Nielsen B, Ejersbo D, Holm K.
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1996 May 20; 158(21):2985-6. PubMed ID: 8686036
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.