These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


295 related items for PubMed ID: 27956352

  • 21. Individual Differences in the Frequency-Following Response: Relation to Pitch Perception.
    Coffey EB, Colagrosso EM, Lehmann A, Schönwiesner M, Zatorre RJ.
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0152374. PubMed ID: 27015271
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. [Reflection of the characteristics of acoustic signals in the summary synchronized responses of neurons of the auditory system of the cat].
    Radionova EA.
    Neirofiziologiia; 1987; 19(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 3574554
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Differences between psychoacoustic and frequency following response measures of distortion tone level and masking.
    Gockel HE, Farooq R, Muhammed L, Plack CJ, Carlyon RP.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2524-35. PubMed ID: 23039446
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Aging degrades the neural encoding of simple and complex sounds in the human brainstem.
    Clinard CG, Tremblay KL.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Oct; 24(7):590-9; quiz 643-4. PubMed ID: 24047946
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Electrocochleographic frequency-following responses as a potential marker of age-related cochlear neural degeneration.
    Temboury-Gutierrez M, Märcher-Rørsted J, Bille M, Yde J, Encina-Llamas G, Hjortkjær J, Dau T.
    Hear Res; 2024 May; 446():109005. PubMed ID: 38598943
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Human frequency following responses to iterated rippled noise with positive and negative gain: Differential sensitivity to waveform envelope and temporal fine-structure.
    Ananthakrishnan S, Krishnan A.
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():113-123. PubMed ID: 30096491
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Does fundamental-frequency discrimination measure virtual pitch discrimination?
    Micheyl C, Divis K, Wrobleski DM, Oxenham AJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):1930-42. PubMed ID: 20968365
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Pitch perception: dissociating frequency from fundamental-frequency discrimination.
    Oxenham AJ, Micheyl C.
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 787():137-45. PubMed ID: 23716218
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Age-related difference in melodic pitch perception is probably mediated by temporal processing: empirical and computational evidence.
    Russo FA, Ives DT, Goy H, Pichora-Fuller MK, Patterson RD.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Oct; 33(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 22367092
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Midbrain-Level Neural Correlates of Behavioral Tone-in-Noise Detection: Dependence on Energy and Envelope Cues.
    Wang Y, Abrams KS, Carney LH, Henry KS.
    J Neurosci; 2021 Aug 25; 41(34):7206-7223. PubMed ID: 34266898
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.