These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


349 related items for PubMed ID: 27977034

  • 1. Factors Predictive of Success in Probing for Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction.
    Beato J, Mota Á, Gonçalves N, Santos-Silva R, Magalhães A, Breda J, Falcão-Reis F.
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2017 Mar 01; 54(2):123-127. PubMed ID: 27977034
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A comparison of the success rates of endoscopic-assisted probing in the treatment of membranous congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction between younger and older children and its correlation with the thickness of the membrane at the Valve of Hasner.
    Gupta N, Neeraj C, Smriti B, Sima D.
    Orbit; 2018 Aug 01; 37(4):257-261. PubMed ID: 29040026
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Intraoperative prognostic factors for probing outcome in children with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
    Andalib D, Nabei R.
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2013 Aug 01; 23(3):329-32. PubMed ID: 23225091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effect of Probing in Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Children Older Than 2 Years.
    Une VL, Kulkarni SS, Nandedkar VS.
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2019 May 22; 56(3):141-145. PubMed ID: 31116859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Success rates of dacryoendoscopy-guided probing for recalcitrant congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
    Fujimoto M, Ogino K, Matsuyama H, Miyazaki C.
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2016 Jul 22; 60(4):274-9. PubMed ID: 27116947
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Results of nasolacrimal duct probing in children between 9-48 months.
    Medghalchi A, Mohammadi MJ, Soltani Moghadam R, Dalili H.
    Acta Med Iran; 2014 Jul 22; 52(7):545-51. PubMed ID: 25135264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of Endoscopically Assisted Primary Probing and Bicanalicular Silicone Intubation for Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Children Aged 4 to 7 Years.
    Arici C, Mergen B, Ozan T, Batu Oto B.
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2023 Jul 22; 60(2):101-107. PubMed ID: 35446188
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction: Comparison of Two Different Treatment Algorithms.
    Napier ML, Armstrong DJ, McLoone SF, McLoone EM.
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2016 Sep 01; 53(5):285-91. PubMed ID: 27486727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Monocanalicular silastic intubation for the initial correction of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
    Engel JM, Hichie-Schmidt C, Khammar A, Ostfeld BM, Vyas A, Ticho BH.
    J AAPOS; 2007 Apr 01; 11(2):183-6. PubMed ID: 17307001
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Success rates of primary probing for congenital nasolacrimal obstruction in children.
    Arora S, Koushan K, Harvey JT.
    J AAPOS; 2012 Apr 01; 16(2):173-6. PubMed ID: 22525175
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Nasolacrimal Duct Probing for Young Children With Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstructions in China: A 10-Year Systematic Review.
    Xiang Q, Gao X, Chen X, Qi J, Fang J.
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2019 Nov 01; 56(6):365-372. PubMed ID: 31743404
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Nasolacrimal Duct Probing under Topical Anesthesia for Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Taiwan.
    Hung CH, Chen YC, Lin SL, Chen WL.
    Pediatr Neonatol; 2015 Dec 01; 56(6):402-7. PubMed ID: 26026949
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A Case Series of Dacryoendoscopy in Childhood: A Diagnostic and Therapeutic Alternative for Complex Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Even in the First Year of Life.
    Heichel J, Struck HG, Fiorentzis M, Hammer T, Bredehorn-Mayr T.
    Adv Ther; 2017 May 01; 34(5):1221-1232. PubMed ID: 28341931
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Success Rate of Probing for Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Children.
    Valcheva KP, Murgova SV, Krivoshiiska EK.
    Folia Med (Plovdiv); 2019 Mar 01; 61(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 31237856
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Factors affecting the success of nasolacrimal duct probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
    Mannor GE, Rose GE, Frimpong-Ansah K, Ezra E.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1999 May 01; 127(5):616-7. PubMed ID: 10334364
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Outcome of probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in older children.
    Honavar SG, Prakash VE, Rao GN.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2000 Jul 01; 130(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 11004258
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of balloon dacryocystoplasty to probing as the primary treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
    Gunton KB, Chung CW, Schnall BM, Prieto D, Wexler A, Koller HP.
    J AAPOS; 2001 Jun 01; 5(3):139-42. PubMed ID: 11404738
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The Role of Inferior Turbinate Fracture in the Management of Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction.
    Rajabi MT, Inanloo B, Salabati M, Rafizadeh M, Tabatabaie SZ, Bayat R, Mahmoudzadeh R.
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Jun 01; 35(3):269-271. PubMed ID: 30234839
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The prevalence of amblyogenic factors in children with persistent congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
    Eshraghi B, Akbari MR, Fard MA, Shahsanaei A, Assari R, Mirmohammadsadeghi A.
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2014 Nov 01; 252(11):1847-52. PubMed ID: 24777709
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Prevalence of buried probe in complex congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction and evaluation of its success rate post 'probing and irrigation': a single-centre retrospective study.
    Gupta N, Chawla N, Ganesh S, Das S, Dhawan N, Bansal S, Singla P.
    Orbit; 2018 Dec 01; 37(6):397-400. PubMed ID: 29400586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.