These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

228 related items for PubMed ID: 27990437

  • 21. Clinical investigation of biofilm in non-healing wounds by high resolution microscopy techniques.
    Hurlow J, Blanz E, Gaddy JA.
    J Wound Care; 2016 Sep; 25 Suppl 9(Suppl 9):S11-22. PubMed ID: 27608736
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. A comparison of the antimicrobial efficacy of two silver-containing wound dressings on burn wound isolates.
    Thomas JG, Slone W, Linton S, Corum L, Percival SL.
    J Wound Care; 2011 Dec; 20(12):580-2, 584-6. PubMed ID: 22240884
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Silver-pig skin nanocomposites and mesenchymal stem cells: suitable antibiofilm cellular dressings for wound healing.
    Pérez-Díaz MA, Silva-Bermudez P, Jiménez-López B, Martínez-López V, Melgarejo-Ramírez Y, Brena-Molina A, Ibarra C, Baeza I, Martínez-Pardo ME, Reyes-Frías ML, Márquez-Gutiérrez E, Velasquillo C, Martínez-Castañon G, Martinez-Gutierrez F, Sánchez-Sánchez R.
    J Nanobiotechnology; 2018 Jan 10; 16(1):2. PubMed ID: 29321021
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Development of In Vitro and Ex Vivo Biofilm Models for the Assessment of Antibacterial Fibrous Electrospun Wound Dressings.
    Lorenz K, Preem L, Sagor K, Putrinš M, Tenson T, Kogermann K.
    Mol Pharm; 2023 Feb 06; 20(2):1230-1246. PubMed ID: 36669095
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Visualisation of bacterial sequestration and bactericidal activity within hydrating Hydrofiber wound dressings.
    Newman GR, Walker M, Hobot JA, Bowler PG.
    Biomaterials; 2006 Mar 06; 27(7):1129-39. PubMed ID: 16120458
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Controlled-release iodine foam dressings demonstrate broad-spectrum biofilm management in several in vitro models.
    Salisbury AM, Mullin M, Foulkes L, Chen R, Percival SL.
    Int Wound J; 2022 Nov 06; 19(7):1717-1728. PubMed ID: 35166016
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. A study on the ability of quaternary ammonium groups attached to a polyurethane foam wound dressing to inhibit bacterial attachment and biofilm formation.
    Tran PL, Hamood AN, de Souza A, Schultz G, Liesenfeld B, Mehta D, Reid TW.
    Wound Repair Regen; 2015 Nov 06; 23(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 25469865
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Aquacel(®) Ag dressing versus Acticoat™ dressing in partial thickness burns: a prospective, randomized, controlled study in 100 patients. Part 1: burn wound healing.
    Verbelen J, Hoeksema H, Heyneman A, Pirayesh A, Monstrey S.
    Burns; 2014 May 06; 40(3):416-27. PubMed ID: 24045072
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. A real-life clinical evaluation of a next-generation antimicrobial dressing on acute and chronic wounds.
    Walker M, Metcalf D, Parsons D, Bowler P.
    J Wound Care; 2015 Jan 06; 24(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 25543819
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Impact of silver-containing wound dressings on bacterial biofilm viability and susceptibility to antibiotics during prolonged treatment.
    Kostenko V, Lyczak J, Turner K, Martinuzzi RJ.
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2010 Dec 06; 54(12):5120-31. PubMed ID: 20855737
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Impact of a novel, antimicrobial dressing on in vivo, Pseudomonas aeruginosa wound biofilm: quantitative comparative analysis using a rabbit ear model.
    Seth AK, Zhong A, Nguyen KT, Hong SJ, Leung KP, Galiano RD, Mustoe TA.
    Wound Repair Regen; 2014 Dec 06; 22(6):712-9. PubMed ID: 25230854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Controlling wound bioburden with a novel silver-containing Hydrofiber dressing.
    Jones SA, Bowler PG, Walker M, Parsons D.
    Wound Repair Regen; 2004 Dec 06; 12(3):288-94. PubMed ID: 15225207
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Hydrogels Containing Antibiofilm and Antimicrobial Agents Beneficial for Biofilm-Associated Wound Infection: Formulation Characterizations and In vitro Study.
    Anjum A, Sim CH, Ng SF.
    AAPS PharmSciTech; 2018 Apr 06; 19(3):1219-1230. PubMed ID: 29280044
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Development of biofilm-targeted antimicrobial wound dressing for the treatment of chronic wound infections.
    Ng SF, Leow HL.
    Drug Dev Ind Pharm; 2015 Apr 06; 41(11):1902-9. PubMed ID: 25758412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Antimicrobial dressings: Comparison of the ability of a panel of dressings to prevent biofilm formation by key burn wound pathogens.
    Halstead FD, Rauf M, Bamford A, Wearn CM, Bishop JRB, Burt R, Fraise AP, Moiemen NS, Oppenheim BA, Webber MA.
    Burns; 2015 Dec 06; 41(8):1683-1694. PubMed ID: 26188884
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. A prospective, single-center, nonblinded, comparative, postmarket clinical evaluation of a bovine-derived collagen with ionic silver dressing versus a carboxymethylcellulose and ionic silver dressing for the reduction of bioburden in variable-etiology, bilateral lower-extremity wounds.
    Manizate F, Fuller A, Gendics C, Lantis JC.
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2012 May 06; 25(5):220-5. PubMed ID: 22517228
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. A novel in vitro wound biofilm model used to evaluate low-frequency ultrasonic-assisted wound debridement.
    Crone S, Garde C, Bjarnsholt T, Alhede M.
    J Wound Care; 2015 Feb 06; 24(2):64, 66-9, 72. PubMed ID: 25647434
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Assessing the effect of an antimicrobial wound dressing on biofilms.
    Percival SL, Bowler P, Woods EJ.
    Wound Repair Regen; 2008 Feb 06; 16(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 18211579
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.