These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


140 related items for PubMed ID: 2799627

  • 1. CT scanning of the breast in problem cases.
    John V, Ewen K.
    Strahlenther Onkol; 1989 Sep; 165(9):657-62. PubMed ID: 2799627
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Microfocal spot magnification mammography using xeroradiographic and screen-film recording systems.
    Sickles EA.
    Radiology; 1979 Jun; 131(3):599-607. PubMed ID: 441362
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Survey of mammography practices.
    Bassett LW, Diamond JJ, Gold RH, McLelland R.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Dec; 149(6):1149-52. PubMed ID: 3318338
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Computed tomographic mammography using a conventional body scanner.
    Chang CH, Nesbit DE, Fisher DR, Fritz SL, Dwyer SJ, Templeton AW, Lin F, Jewell WR.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Mar; 138(3):553-8. PubMed ID: 6978009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Clinical advantage of xeroradiography in the diagnosis of breast cancer].
    Takahashi I, Suzuki K.
    Gan No Rinsho; 1985 May; Suppl():83-95. PubMed ID: 4068235
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [ROC-analysis in x-ray study of the breast; a comparative study between film and xeromammography].
    John V, Callies R, Hirche H, Parson C, Tonge K, Lenz W.
    Onkologie; 1979 Oct; 2(5):193-8. PubMed ID: 395475
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Single view negative mode xeromammography: an approach to reduce radiation exposure in breast cancer screening.
    Buchanan JB, Jager RM.
    Radiology; 1977 Apr; 123(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 847175
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Magnification mammography: evaluation of screen-film and xeroradiographic techniques.
    Haus AG, Paulus DD, Dodd GD, Cowart RW, Bencomo J.
    Radiology; 1979 Oct; 133(1):223-6. PubMed ID: 472295
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Mammography using an ultrahigh-strip-density, stationary, focused grid.
    Dershaw DD, Masterson ME, Malik S, Cruz NM.
    Radiology; 1985 Aug; 156(2):541-4. PubMed ID: 4011922
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Low-dose multidetector dynamic CT in the breast: preliminary study.
    Seo BK, Pisano ED, Cho KR, Cho PK, Lee JY, Kim SJ.
    Clin Imaging; 2005 Aug; 29(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 15855061
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A demonstration comparing film mammography with the new high sensitivity xeromammography.
    Martin JE.
    Radiographics; 1989 Jan; 9(1):153-68. PubMed ID: 2913617
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Film-screen combinations in mammography].
    Friedrich M.
    Z Lymphol; 1983 Dec; 7(2):92-103. PubMed ID: 6673399
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Breast imaging.
    Kopans DB, Meyer JE, Sadowsky N.
    N Engl J Med; 1984 Apr 12; 310(15):960-7. PubMed ID: 6366562
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.