These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


500 related items for PubMed ID: 28000274

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The complete digital workflow in fixed prosthodontics: a systematic review.
    Joda T, Zarone F, Ferrari M.
    BMC Oral Health; 2017 Sep 19; 17(1):124. PubMed ID: 28927393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Complete digital workflow for the production of implant-supported single-unit monolithic crowns.
    Joda T, Brägger U.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Nov 19; 25(11):1304-1306. PubMed ID: 25040237
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Monolithic implant-supported lithium disilicate (LS2) crowns in a complete digital workflow: A prospective clinical trial with a 2-year follow-up.
    Joda T, Ferrari M, Brägger U.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Jun 19; 19(3):505-511. PubMed ID: 28093860
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of Treatment Time for Single-Implant Crowns Between Digital and Conventional Workflows for Posterior Implant Restorations: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Jarangkul W, Kunavisarut C, Pornprasertsuk-Damrongsri S, Joda T.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2024 Apr 24; 39(2):286-293. PubMed ID: 37910827
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Digital vs. conventional implant prosthetic workflows: a cost/time analysis.
    Joda T, Brägger U.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Dec 24; 26(12):1430-5. PubMed ID: 25179680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Digital data acquisition for a CAD/CAM-fabricated titanium framework and zirconium oxide restorations for an implant-supported fixed complete dental prosthesis.
    Lin WS, Metz MJ, Pollini A, Ntounis A, Morton D.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec 24; 112(6):1324-9. PubMed ID: 25258258
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Time-efficiency and cost-analysis comparing three digital workflows for treatment with monolithic zirconia implant fixed dental prostheses: A double-blinded RCT.
    Joda T, Gintaute A, Brägger U, Ferrari M, Weber K, Zitzmann NU.
    J Dent; 2021 Oct 24; 113():103779. PubMed ID: 34391875
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Application of and progress in computer aided design and computer aided manufacture materials by chairside digital workflow in implant prosthodontics].
    Wu ZD, Wei DH, Di P, Lin Y.
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Oct 09; 54(10):707-711. PubMed ID: 31607010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Use of prefabricated titanium abutments and customized anatomic lithium disilicate structures for cement-retained implant restorations in the esthetic zone.
    Lin WS, Harris BT, Zandinejad A, Martin WC, Morton D.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Mar 09; 111(3):181-5. PubMed ID: 24360007
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Use of implant-supported interim restorations to transfer periimplant soft tissue profiles to a milled polyurethane definitive cast.
    Lin WS, Harris BT, Morton D.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May 09; 109(5):333-7. PubMed ID: 23684284
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 25.