These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
423 related items for PubMed ID: 28027223
21. Aesthetic Limitations in Direct-to-Implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction. Safran T, Al-Badarin F, Al-Halabi B, Viezel-Mathieu A, Dionisopoulos T. Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Jul 01; 150(1):22e-31e. PubMed ID: 35499675 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. From Salvage to Prevention: A Single-Surgeon Experience with Acellular Dermal Matrix and Infection in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction. Powers JM, Reuter Muñoz KD, Parkerson J, Nigro LC, Blanchet NP. Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Dec 01; 148(6):1201-1208. PubMed ID: 34644266 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparing Outcomes of Wise-Pattern, Two-Stage Breast Reduction-Reconstruction with and without Acellular Dermal Matrix. Patel AA, Kayaleh H, Sala LA, Peterson DJ, Upadhyaya PK. Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Sep 01; 148(3):511-521. PubMed ID: 34432681 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison study of two types of expander-based breast reconstruction: acellular dermal matrix-assisted versus total submuscular placement. Hanna KR, DeGeorge BR, Mericli AF, Lin KY, Drake DB. Ann Plast Surg; 2013 Jan 01; 70(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 21862915 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of implant-based immediate breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix. Vardanian AJ, Clayton JL, Roostaeian J, Shirvanian V, Da Lio A, Lipa JE, Crisera C, Festekjian JH. Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Nov 01; 128(5):403e-410e. PubMed ID: 22030500 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: A Historically Controlled, Propensity Score-Matched Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes. Haddock NT, Kadakia Y, Liu Y, Teotia SS. Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Jul 01; 148(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 34003807 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Oncologic Safety of Staged Prepectoral Implant Reconstruction following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Mean 9-Year Follow-Up. Salibian AH, Harness JK. Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Sep 01; 150(3):513-522. PubMed ID: 35749533 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Breast Reconstruction Actualized in Nipple-sparing Mastectomy and Direct-to-implant, Prepectoral Polyurethane Positioning: Early Experience and Preliminary Results. de Vita R, Buccheri EM, Villanucci A, Pozzi M. Clin Breast Cancer; 2019 Apr 01; 19(2):e358-e363. PubMed ID: 30691930 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Immediate implant-based breast reconstruction following total skin-sparing mastectomy: defining the risk of preoperative and postoperative radiation therapy for surgical outcomes. Sbitany H, Wang F, Peled AW, Lentz R, Alvarado M, Ewing CA, Esserman LJ, Fowble B, Foster RD. Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Sep 01; 134(3):396-404. PubMed ID: 25158699 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Unilateral preoperative chest wall irradiation in bilateral tissue expander breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix: a prospective outcomes analysis. Weichman KE, Cemal Y, Albornoz CR, McCarthy CM, Pusic AL, Mehrara BJ, Disa JJ. Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 May 01; 131(5):921-927. PubMed ID: 23385983 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. A Review of the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrices in Postmastectomy Immediate Breast Reconstruction. Chao AH. Plast Surg Nurs; 2015 May 01; 35(3):131-4; quiz 135-6. PubMed ID: 26313677 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. A Prospective Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes of Subpectoral and Prepectoral Strattice-Based Immediate Breast Reconstruction. Baker BG, Irri R, MacCallum V, Chattopadhyay R, Murphy J, Harvey JR. Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 May 01; 141(5):1077-1084. PubMed ID: 29697602 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Uneventful versus Successful Reconstruction and Outcome Pathways in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrices. Qureshi AA, Broderick KP, Belz J, Funk S, Reaven N, Brandt KE, Tenenbaum MM, Margenthaler JA, Aft RL, Myckatyn TM. Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Aug 01; 138(2):173e-183e. PubMed ID: 27465177 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The cost effectiveness of acellular dermal matrix in expander-implant immediate breast reconstruction. Krishnan NM, Chatterjee A, Rosenkranz KM, Powell SG, Nigriny JF, Vidal DC. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2014 Apr 01; 67(4):468-76. PubMed ID: 24508194 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Direct-to-Implant, Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Single-Surgeon Experience with 201 Consecutive Patients. Safran T, Al-Halabi B, Viezel-Mathieu A, Boileau JF, Dionisopoulos T. Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Apr 01; 145(4):686e-696e. PubMed ID: 32221195 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Safety Profile and Predictors of Aesthetic Outcomes After Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction With Meshed Acellular Dermal Matrix. Belmonte BM, Campbell CA. Ann Plast Surg; 2021 Jun 01; 86(6S Suppl 5):S585-S592. PubMed ID: 34100818 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. One-Step Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction With Dermal Matrix-Covered Implant Compared to Submuscular Implantation: Functional and Cost Evaluation. Cattelani L, Polotto S, Arcuri MF, Pedrazzi G, Linguadoca C, Bonati E. Clin Breast Cancer; 2018 Aug 01; 18(4):e703-e711. PubMed ID: 29275104 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The Effect of Implant Type on Nipple Position Geometry and Aesthetics Following Tissue Expander Reconstruction After Nipple Sparing Mastectomy. Dorfman RG, Mioton L, Stone E, Yan W, Qiu C, Marla S, Kim JY. Aesthet Surg J; 2018 May 15; 38(6):605-613. PubMed ID: 29267860 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]