These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
218 related items for PubMed ID: 28045959
1. The Impact of Detoxification Costs and Predation Risk on Foraging: Implications for Mimicry Dynamics. Halpin CG, Skelhorn J, Rowe C, Ruxton GD, Higginson AD. PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169043. PubMed ID: 28045959 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Predators' decisions to eat defended prey depend on the size of undefended prey. Halpin CG, Skelhorn J, Rowe C. Anim Behav; 2013 Jun 22; 85(6):1315-1321. PubMed ID: 23814280 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Predators' toxin burdens influence their strategic decisions to eat toxic prey. Skelhorn J, Rowe C. Curr Biol; 2007 Sep 04; 17(17):1479-83. PubMed ID: 17716896 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Mimicry among Unequally Defended Prey Should Be Mutualistic When Predators Sample Optimally. Aubier TG, Joron M, Sherratt TN. Am Nat; 2017 Mar 04; 189(3):267-282. PubMed ID: 28221836 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The benefits of being toxic to deter predators depends on prey body size. Smith KE, Halpin CG, Rowe C. Behav Ecol; 2016 Mar 04; 27(6):1650-1655. PubMed ID: 28028378 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Mimicry between unequally defended prey can be parasitic: evidence for quasi-Batesian mimicry. Rowland HM, Mappes J, Ruxton GD, Speed MP. Ecol Lett; 2010 Dec 04; 13(12):1494-502. PubMed ID: 20955507 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Disentangling taste and toxicity in aposematic prey. Holen ØH. Proc Biol Sci; 2013 Feb 22; 280(1753):20122588. PubMed ID: 23256198 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. State-Dependent Decision-Making by Predators and Its Consequences for Mimicry. Aubier TG, Sherratt TN. Am Nat; 2020 Nov 22; 196(5):E127-E144. PubMed ID: 33064589 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The relationship between sympatric defended species depends upon predators' discriminatory behaviour. Halpin CG, Skelhorn J, Rowe C. PLoS One; 2012 Nov 22; 7(9):e44895. PubMed ID: 22970323 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Body size matters for aposematic prey during predator aversion learning. Smith KE, Halpin CG, Rowe C. Behav Processes; 2014 Nov 22; 109 Pt B():173-9. PubMed ID: 25256160 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of alternative prey on the dynamics of imperfect Batesian and Müllerian mimicries. Lindström L, Alatalo RV, Lyytinen A, Mappes J. Evolution; 2004 Jun 22; 58(6):1294-302. PubMed ID: 15266978 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Effect of Predator Population Dynamics on Batesian Mimicry Complexes. Kikuchi DW, Barfield M, Herberstein ME, Mappes J, Holt RD. Am Nat; 2022 Mar 22; 199(3):406-419. PubMed ID: 35175899 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Predator experience on cryptic prey affects the survival of conspicuous aposematic prey. Lindström L, Alatalo RV, Lyytinen A, Mappes J. Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Feb 22; 268(1465):357-61. PubMed ID: 11270431 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]