These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

194 related items for PubMed ID: 28068302

  • 1. First Report: Linear Incision for Placement of a Magnetically Coupled Bone-Anchored Hearing Implant.
    Barry JY, Reghunathan S, Jacob A.
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Feb; 38(2):221-224. PubMed ID: 28068302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: inside or outside the line of incision?
    Strijbos RM, den Besten CA, Mylanus EA, Hol MK.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Nov; 273(11):3713-3722. PubMed ID: 27086360
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: dermatome versus linear incision technique.
    Strijbos RM, Bom SJH, Zwerver S, Hol MKS.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Jan; 274(1):109-117. PubMed ID: 27439945
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Successful loading of a bone-anchored hearing implant at two weeks after surgery: randomized trial of two surgical methods and detailed stability measurements.
    Høgsbro M, Agger A, Johansen LV.
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Feb; 36(2):e51-7. PubMed ID: 25341064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: linear incision technique with tissue preservation versus linear incision technique with tissue reduction.
    van der Stee EHH, Strijbos RM, Bom SJH, Hol MKS.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Jul; 275(7):1737-1747. PubMed ID: 29846791
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Punch and Drill: Implantation of Bone Anchored Hearing Device Through a Minimal Skin Punch Incision Versus Implantation With Dermatome and Soft Tissue Reduction.
    Dumon T, Medina M, Sperling NM.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2016 Mar; 125(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 26384503
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Conversion of traditional osseointegrated bone-anchored hearing aids to the Baha® attract in four pediatric patients.
    Cedars E, Chan D, Lao A, Hardies L, Meyer A, Rosbe K.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Dec; 91():37-42. PubMed ID: 27863639
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery compared to the linear incision technique without soft tissue reduction for bone conduction hearing implants: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Calon TG, van Hoof M, van den Berge H, de Bruijn AJ, van Tongeren J, Hof JR, Brunings JW, Jonhede S, Anteunis LJ, Janssen M, Joore MA, Holmberg M, Johansson ML, Stokroos RJ.
    Trials; 2016 Nov 09; 17(1):540. PubMed ID: 27829464
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Bone-anchored Hearing Implant Surgery: Randomized Trial of Dermatome Versus Linear Incision Without Soft Tissue Reduction--Clinical Measures.
    Høgsbro M, Agger A, Johansen LV.
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jun 09; 36(5):805-11. PubMed ID: 25695686
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A five-year follow-up on the osseointegration of bone-anchored hearing device implantation without tissue reduction.
    Hultcrantz M, Lanis A.
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Sep 09; 35(8):1480-5. PubMed ID: 24770406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Retrospective analysis of skin complications related to bone-anchored hearing aid implant: association with surgical technique, quality of life, and audiological benefit.
    Peñaranda D, Garcia JM, Aparicio ML, Montes F, Barón C, Jiménez RC, Peñaranda A.
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Sep 09; 84(3):324-331. PubMed ID: 28506614
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Controlled Clinical Trial on Bone-anchored Hearing Implants and a Surgical Technique With Soft-tissue Preservation.
    den Besten CA, Bosman AJ, Nelissen RC, Mylanus EA, Hol MK.
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Jun 09; 37(5):504-12. PubMed ID: 26945315
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Simplified bone-anchored hearing aid insertion using a linear incision without soft tissue reduction.
    Husseman J, Szudek J, Monksfield P, Power D, O'Leary S, Briggs R.
    J Laryngol Otol; 2013 Jul 09; 127 Suppl 2():S33-8. PubMed ID: 23651553
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Soft tissue overgrowth in bone-anchored hearing aid patients: use of 8.5 mm abutment.
    Pelosi S, Chandrasekhar SS.
    J Laryngol Otol; 2011 Jun 09; 125(6):576-9. PubMed ID: 21457592
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Post-operative infection rates in linear vs. punch technique for bone anchored hearing systems.
    Kellermeyer B, Lange L, Wazen JJ.
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2020 Jun 09; 41(6):102745. PubMed ID: 33198052
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.