These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
288 related items for PubMed ID: 28072693
1. Comparative evaluation of target volumes defined by deformable and rigid registration of diagnostic PET/CT to planning CT in primary esophageal cancer. Guo Y, Li J, Zhang P, Shao Q, Xu M, Li Y. Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Jan; 96(1):e5528. PubMed ID: 28072693 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Superiority of Deformable Image Co-registration in the Integration of Diagnostic Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography to the Radiotherapy Treatment Planning Pathway for Oesophageal Carcinoma. Ward G, Ramasamy S, Sykes JR, Prestwich R, Chowdhury F, Scarsbrook A, Murray P, Harris K, Crellin A, Hatfield P, Sebag-Montefiore D, Spezi E, Crosby T, Radhakrishna G. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2016 Oct; 28(10):655-62. PubMed ID: 27266819 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of rigid and deformable image registration for nasopharyngeal carcinoma radiotherapy planning with diagnostic position PET/CT. Kai Y, Arimura H, Toya R, Saito T, Matsuyama T, Fukugawa Y, Shiraishi S, Shimohigashi Y, Maruyama M, Oya N. Jpn J Radiol; 2020 Mar; 38(3):256-264. PubMed ID: 31834577 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [F18] FDG-PET/CT for manual or semiautomated GTV delineation of the primary tumor for radiation therapy planning in patients with esophageal cancer: is it useful? Walter F, Jell C, Zollner B, Andrae C, Gerum S, Ilhan H, Belka C, Niyazi M, Roeder F. Strahlenther Onkol; 2021 Sep; 197(9):780-790. PubMed ID: 33104815 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of rigid and deformable registration through the respiratory phases of four-dimensional computed tomography image data sets for radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery. Zhang A, Li J, Qiu H, Wang W, Guo Y. Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Dec; 96(50):e9143. PubMed ID: 29390317 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of gross target volumes based on four-dimensional CT, positron emission tomography-computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in thoracic esophageal cancer. Li H, Li F, Li J, Zhu Y, Zhang Y, Guo Y, Xu M, Shao Q, Liu X. Cancer Med; 2020 Aug; 9(15):5353-5361. PubMed ID: 32510183 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography on computed tomography defined target volumes in radiation treatment planning of esophageal cancer: reduction in geographic misses with equal inter-observer variability: PET/CT improves esophageal target definition. Schreurs LM, Busz DM, Paardekooper GM, Beukema JC, Jager PL, Van der Jagt EJ, van Dam GM, Groen H, Plukker JT, Langendijk JA. Dis Esophagus; 2010 Aug; 23(6):493-501. PubMed ID: 20113320 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Prospective feasibility trial of radiotherapy target definition for head and neck cancer using 3-dimensional PET and CT imaging. Scarfone C, Lavely WC, Cmelak AJ, Delbeke D, Martin WH, Billheimer D, Hallahan DE. J Nucl Med; 2004 Apr; 45(4):543-52. PubMed ID: 15073248 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]