These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

403 related items for PubMed ID: 28074260

  • 21. Intraoral 3D Scanning or Dental Impressions for the Assessment of Dental Arch Relationships in Cleft Care: Which is Superior?
    Chalmers EV, McIntyre GT, Wang W, Gillgrass T, Martin CB, Mossey PA.
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2016 Sep; 53(5):568-77. PubMed ID: 26623548
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements obtained from Cecile3 digital models.
    Watanabe-Kanno GA, Abrão J, Miasiro Junior H, Sánchez-Ayala A, Lagravère MO.
    Braz Oral Res; 2009 Sep; 23(3):288-95. PubMed ID: 19893964
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. [Accuracy and reproducibility of intraoral scanning in vivo].
    Xie YL, Shen G.
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2016 Oct; 25(5):593-599. PubMed ID: 28116434
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. From alginate impressions to digital virtual models: accuracy and reproducibility.
    Dalstra M, Melsen B.
    J Orthod; 2009 Mar; 36(1):36-41; discussion 14. PubMed ID: 19286874
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Comparison of linear measurements and analyses taken from plaster models and three-dimensional images.
    Porto BG, Porto TS, Silva MB, Grehs RA, Pinto Ados S, Bhandi SH, Tonetto MR, Bandéca MC, dos Santos-Pinto LA.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Nov 01; 15(6):681-7. PubMed ID: 25825090
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Digital models: How can dental arch form be verified chairside?
    Tavares A, Braga E, Araújo TM.
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2017 Nov 01; 22(6):68-73. PubMed ID: 29364382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Dental models made with an intraoral scanner: a validation study.
    Cuperus AM, Harms MC, Rangel FA, Bronkhorst EM, Schols JG, Breuning KH.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Sep 01; 142(3):308-13. PubMed ID: 22920696
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Assessing agreement in measurements of orthodontic study models: Digital caliper on plaster models vs 3-dimensional software on models scanned by structured-light scanner.
    Wan Hassan WN, Othman SA, Chan CS, Ahmad R, Ali SN, Abd Rohim A.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov 01; 150(5):886-895. PubMed ID: 27871715
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Comparison of linear transverse measures between plaster and resin printed digital models.
    Manuelli M, Huanca Ghislanzoni L, Farronato M, Martintoni A, Marcolina M, Lucchese A.
    J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2018 Nov 01; 32(2 Suppl. 2):81-85. PubMed ID: 29720334
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Accuracy of five intraoral scanners compared to indirect digitalization.
    Güth JF, Runkel C, Beuer F, Stimmelmayr M, Edelhoff D, Keul C.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jun 01; 21(5):1445-1455. PubMed ID: 27406138
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Computerized Casts for Orthodontic Purpose Using Powder-Free Intraoral Scanners: Accuracy, Execution Time, and Patient Feedback.
    Sfondrini MF, Gandini P, Malfatto M, Di Corato F, Trovati F, Scribante A.
    Biomed Res Int; 2018 Jun 01; 2018():4103232. PubMed ID: 29850512
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance.
    Grünheid T, McCarthy SD, Larson BE.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Nov 01; 146(5):673-82. PubMed ID: 25439218
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Reliability and validity of measurements on digital study models and plaster models.
    Reuschl RP, Heuer W, Stiesch M, Wenzel D, Dittmer MP.
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Feb 01; 38(1):22-26. PubMed ID: 25724574
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. The reliability of Little's Irregularity Index for the upper dental arch using three dimensional (3D) digital models.
    Burns A, Dowling AH, Garvey TM, Fleming GJ.
    J Dent; 2014 Oct 01; 42(10):1320-6. PubMed ID: 25064042
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Comparison between stone and digital cast measurements in mixed dentition : Validity, reliability, reproducibility, and objectivity.
    Schieffer L, Latzko L, Ulmer H, Schenz-Spisic N, Lepperdinger U, Paulus M, Crismani AG.
    J Orofac Orthop; 2022 Oct 01; 83(Suppl 1):75-84. PubMed ID: 35238945
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Reproducibility of an intraoral scanner: A comparison between in-vivo and ex-vivo scans.
    Sun L, Lee JS, Choo HH, Hwang HS, Lee KM.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Aug 01; 154(2):305-310. PubMed ID: 30075932
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.