These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

358 related items for PubMed ID: 28075335

  • 1. Towards standardization of x-ray beam filters in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: Monte Carlo simulations and analytical modelling.
    Shrestha S, Vedantham S, Karellas A.
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Mar 07; 62(5):1969-1993. PubMed ID: 28075335
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Generation and analysis of clinically relevant breast imaging x-ray spectra.
    Hernandez AM, Seibert JA, Nosratieh A, Boone JM.
    Med Phys; 2017 Jun 07; 44(6):2148-2160. PubMed ID: 28303582
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Dosimetric characterization and organ dose assessment in digital breast tomosynthesis: Measurements and Monte Carlo simulations using voxel phantoms.
    Baptista M, Di Maria S, Barros S, Figueira C, Sarmento M, Orvalho L, Vaz P.
    Med Phys; 2015 Jul 07; 42(7):3788-800. PubMed ID: 26133581
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Optimization of x-ray spectra in digital mammography through Monte Carlo simulations.
    Cunha DM, Tomal A, Poletti ME.
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Apr 07; 57(7):1919-35. PubMed ID: 22421418
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Effects on image quality of a 2D antiscatter grid in x-ray digital breast tomosynthesis: Initial experience using the dual modality (x-ray and molecular) breast tomosynthesis scanner.
    Patel T, Peppard H, Williams MB.
    Med Phys; 2016 Apr 07; 43(4):1720. PubMed ID: 27036570
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Monte Carlo performance on the x-ray converter thickness in digital mammography using software breast models.
    Liaparinos P, Bliznakova K.
    Med Phys; 2012 Nov 07; 39(11):6638-51. PubMed ID: 23127058
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Optimization of a dual-energy contrast-enhanced technique for a photon-counting digital breast tomosynthesis system: I. A theoretical model.
    Carton AK, Ullberg C, Lindman K, Acciavatti R, Francke T, Maidment AD.
    Med Phys; 2010 Nov 07; 37(11):5896-907. PubMed ID: 21158302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A search for optimal x-ray spectra in iodine contrast media mammography.
    Ullman G, Sandborg M, Dance DR, Yaffe M, Alm Carlsson G.
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jul 07; 50(13):3143-52. PubMed ID: 15972986
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The relationship between the attenuation properties of breast microcalcifications and aluminum.
    Zanca F, Van Ongeval C, Marshall N, Meylaers T, Michielsen K, Marchal G, Bosmans H.
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb 21; 55(4):1057-68. PubMed ID: 20090185
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The effect of scatter and glare on image quality in contrast-enhanced breast imaging using an a-Si/CsI(TI) full-field flat panel detector.
    Carton AK, Acciavatti R, Kuo J, Maidment AD.
    Med Phys; 2009 Mar 21; 36(3):920-8. PubMed ID: 19378752
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Monte Carlo derivation of filtered tungsten anode X-ray spectra for dose computation in digital mammography.
    Paixão L, Oliveira BB, Viloria C, de Oliveira MA, Teixeira MH, Nogueira Mdo S.
    Radiol Bras; 2015 Mar 21; 48(6):363-7. PubMed ID: 26811553
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Scatter radiation in digital tomosynthesis of the breast.
    Sechopoulos I, Suryanarayanan S, Vedantham S, D'Orsi CJ, Karellas A.
    Med Phys; 2007 Feb 21; 34(2):564-76. PubMed ID: 17388174
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Suitability of new anode materials in mammography: dose and subject contrast considerations using Monte Carlo simulation.
    Delis H, Spyrou G, Costaridou L, Tzanakos G, Panayiotakis G.
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov 21; 33(11):4221-35. PubMed ID: 17153401
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Clinical digital breast tomosynthesis system: dosimetric characterization.
    Feng SS, Sechopoulos I.
    Radiology; 2012 Apr 21; 263(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 22332070
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. COMPARISON OF SPECTRA AND MEAN GLANDULAR DOSE WITH TUBE VOLTAGES USED IN DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS FROM SIMULATED, METROLOGICAL AND CLINICAL CASES.
    da Silveira Gatto LB, Braz D, Pacifico L, Travassos P, Magalhaes LAG.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Dec 30; 192(3):402-412. PubMed ID: 33320943
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.