These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
358 related items for PubMed ID: 28075335
21. Effects of kV, filtration, dose, and object size on soft tissue and iodine contrast in dedicated breast CT. Hernandez AM, Abbey CK, Ghazi P, Burkett G, Boone JM. Med Phys; 2020 Jul; 47(7):2869-2880. PubMed ID: 32233091 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Mean glandular dose estimation using MCNPX for a digital breast tomosynthesis system with tungsten/aluminum and tungsten/aluminum+silver x-ray anode-filter combinations. Ma AK, Darambara DG, Stewart A, Gunn S, Bullard E. Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5278-89. PubMed ID: 19175087 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Monte Carlo calculation of monoenergetic and polyenergetic DgN coefficients for mean glandular dose estimates in mammography using a homogeneous breast model. Sarno A, Tucciariello RM, Mettivier G, di Franco F, Russo P. Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jun 20; 64(12):125012. PubMed ID: 31141793 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Normalized glandular dose coefficients for digital breast tomosynthesis systems with a homogeneous breast model. Sarno A, Tucciariello RM, Mettivier G, Del Sarto D, Fantacci ME, Russo P. Phys Med Biol; 2021 Mar 12; 66(6):065024. PubMed ID: 33535193 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Multiscale Monte Carlo simulations for dosimetry in x-ray breast imaging: Part I - Macroscopic scales. Massera RT, Tomal A, Thomson RM. Med Phys; 2024 Feb 12; 51(2):1105-1116. PubMed ID: 38156766 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Thickness of molybdenum filter and squared contrast-to-noise ratio per dose for digital mammography. Nishino TK, Wu X, Johnson RF. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Oct 12; 185(4):960-3. PubMed ID: 16177415 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Reducing radiation dose by application of optimized low-energy x-ray filters to K-edge imaging with a photon counting detector. Choi YN, Lee S, Kim HJ. Phys Med Biol; 2016 Jan 21; 61(2):N35-49. PubMed ID: 26733235 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Optimal beam quality selection in digital mammography. Young KC, Oduko JM, Bosmans H, Nijs K, Martinez L. Br J Radiol; 2006 Dec 21; 79(948):981-90. PubMed ID: 17213303 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Optimal beam quality selection based on contrast-to-noise ratio and mean glandular dose in digital mammography. Aminah M, Ng KH, Abdullah BJ, Jamal N. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2010 Dec 21; 33(4):329-34. PubMed ID: 20938762 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Estimation of mean glandular dose for contrast enhanced digital mammography: factors for use with the UK, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols. Dance DR, Young KC. Phys Med Biol; 2014 May 07; 59(9):2127-37. PubMed ID: 24699200 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Anisotropic imaging performance in breast tomosynthesis. Badano A, Kyprianou IS, Jennings RJ, Sempau J. Med Phys; 2007 Nov 07; 34(11):4076-91. PubMed ID: 18074617 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Further factors for the estimation of mean glandular dose using the United Kingdom, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols. Dance DR, Young KC, van Engen RE. Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jul 21; 54(14):4361-72. PubMed ID: 19550001 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]