These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

244 related items for PubMed ID: 2808443

  • 41. Flow characteristics of four commonly used mechanical heart valves.
    Rashtian MY, Stevenson DM, Allen DT, Yoganathan AP, Harrison EC, Edmiston WA, Faughan P, Rahimtoola SH.
    Am J Cardiol; 1986 Oct 01; 58(9):743-52. PubMed ID: 3766415
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42. In vitro comparison of bileaflet aortic heart valve prostheses. St. Jude Medical, CarboMedics, modified Edwards-Duromedics, and Sorin-Bicarbon valves.
    Reul H, van Son JA, Steinseifer U, Schmitz B, Schmidt A, Schmitz C, Rau G.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Sep 01; 106(3):412-20. PubMed ID: 8361181
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43. An in vitro assessment by means of laser Doppler velocimetry of the medtronic advantage bileaflet mechanical heart valve hinge flow.
    Saxena R, Lemmon J, Ellis J, Yoganathan A.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2003 Jul 01; 126(1):90-8. PubMed ID: 12878943
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. Prosthetic heart valve evaluation by magnetic resonance imaging.
    Hasenkam JM, Ringgaard S, Houlind K, Botnar RM, Stødkilde-Jørgensen H, Boesiger P, Pedersen EM.
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1999 Sep 01; 16(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 10554848
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. [Hydrodynamic in vitro comparison of a new artificial heart valve with the Björk-Shiley valve (standard)].
    Pohl M, Wendt MO, Lerche D.
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1991 Jun 01; 36(6):134-9. PubMed ID: 1883926
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46. In vitro evaluation of the long-body On-X bileaflet heart valve.
    Hwang NH, Reul H, Reinhard P.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Sep 01; 7(5):561-8. PubMed ID: 9793857
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49. An in vitro comparative study of St. Jude Medical and Edwards-Duromedics bileaflet valves using laser anemometry.
    Fatemi R, Chandran KB.
    J Biomech Eng; 1989 Nov 01; 111(4):298-302. PubMed ID: 2486368
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50. [Continuous wave Doppler echocardiographic assessment of prosthetic aortic valves].
    Kisanuki A, Tei C, Arikawa K, Otsuji Y, Kawazoe Y, Natsugoe K, Tanaka H, Morishita Y, Taira A.
    J Cardiogr; 1986 Mar 01; 16(1):121-32. PubMed ID: 3782875
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52. Current status of the Beall, Bjork-Shiley, Braunwald-Cutter, Lillehei-Kaster and Smeloff-Cutter cardiac valve prostheses.
    Brawley RK, Donahoo JS, Gott VL.
    Am J Cardiol; 1975 Jun 01; 35(6):855-65. PubMed ID: 124127
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54. Bileaflet, tilting disc and porcine aortic valve substitutes: in vivo hydrodynamic characteristics.
    Gray RJ, Chaux A, Matloff JM, DeRobertis M, Raymond M, Stewart M, Yoganathan A.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1984 Feb 01; 3(2 Pt 1):321-7. PubMed ID: 6693620
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.