These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

141 related items for PubMed ID: 2809867

  • 1. [Estimation of surviving auditory nerve by electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (FABR)--comparison between extra-cochlear stimulation and intra-cochlear stimulation].
    Hatsushika S, Funasaka S.
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1989 Jul; 92(7):1005-11. PubMed ID: 2809867
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study.
    Xu J, Shepherd RK, Millard RE, Clark GM.
    Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):1-29. PubMed ID: 9083801
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in cats. Physiological and histopathological results.
    Shepherd RK, Clark GM, Black RC.
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1983 Mar; 399():19-31. PubMed ID: 6316712
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Cochlear pathology following chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: II. Deafened kittens.
    Shepherd RK, Matsushima J, Martin RL, Clark GM.
    Hear Res; 1994 Dec; 81(1-2):150-66. PubMed ID: 7737922
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Physiologic measures of electrically evoked auditory system responsiveness: effects of pathology and electrical stimulation.
    Miller JM.
    Am J Otol; 1991 Dec; 12 Suppl():28-36; discussion 43-7. PubMed ID: 2069186
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat: comparisons between psychophysical and central auditory neuronal thresholds.
    Beitel RE, Snyder RL, Schreiner CE, Raggio MW, Leake PA.
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 Apr; 83(4):2145-62. PubMed ID: 10758124
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effects of chronic high-rate electrical stimulation on the cochlea and eighth nerve in the deafened guinea pig.
    Mitchell A, Miller JM, Finger PA, Heller JW, Raphael Y, Altschuler RA.
    Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):30-43. PubMed ID: 9083802
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Electrically induced auditory brainstem response as a clinical tool in estimating nerve survival.
    Simmons FB, Lusted HS, Meyers T, Shelton C.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1984 Mar; 112():97-100. PubMed ID: 6431890
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: the effect of electrode position on neural excitation.
    Shepherd RK, Hatsushika S, Clark GM.
    Hear Res; 1993 Mar; 66(1):108-20. PubMed ID: 8473242
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of electrode sites in electrical stimulation of the cochlea.
    Lusted HS, Shelton C, Simmons FB.
    Laryngoscope; 1984 Jul; 94(7):878-82. PubMed ID: 6738264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I. Correlation of physiological responses with cochlear status.
    Shepherd RK, Javel E.
    Hear Res; 1997 Jun; 108(1-2):112-44. PubMed ID: 9213127
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates.
    Tykocinski M, Shepherd RK, Clark GM.
    Hear Res; 1995 Aug; 88(1-2):124-42. PubMed ID: 8575988
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Does electrical stimulation of deaf cochleae prevent spiral ganglion degeneration?
    Li L, Parkins CW, Webster DB.
    Hear Res; 1999 Jul; 133(1-2):27-39. PubMed ID: 10416862
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in neonatally deafened cats: effects of intensity and stimulating electrode location.
    Leake PA, Snyder RL, Hradek GT, Rebscher SJ.
    Hear Res; 1992 Dec; 64(1):99-117. PubMed ID: 1490906
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.