These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

316 related items for PubMed ID: 28107735

  • 1. Breast cancers detected in only one of two arms of a tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) population screening trial (STORM-2).
    Bernardi D, Houssami N.
    Breast; 2017 Apr; 32():98-101. PubMed ID: 28107735
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effect of integrating digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) with acquired or synthetic 2D-mammography on radiologists' true-positive and false-positive detection in a population screening trial: A descriptive study.
    Bernardi D, Li T, Pellegrini M, Macaskill P, Valentini M, Fantò C, Ostillio L, Houssami N.
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Sep; 106():26-31. PubMed ID: 30150047
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Breast cancer detection using single-reading of breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) compared to double-reading of 2D-mammography: Evidence from a population-based trial.
    Houssami N, Bernardi D, Pellegrini M, Valentini M, Fantò C, Ostillio L, Tuttobene P, Luparia A, Macaskill P.
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 47():94-99. PubMed ID: 28192742
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Breast screening using 2D-mammography or integrating digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) for single-reading or double-reading--evidence to guide future screening strategies.
    Houssami N, Macaskill P, Bernardi D, Caumo F, Pellegrini M, Brunelli S, Tuttobene P, Bricolo P, Fantò C, Valentini M, Ciatto S.
    Eur J Cancer; 2014 Jul; 50(10):1799-1807. PubMed ID: 24746887
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effect of integrating 3D-mammography (digital breast tomosynthesis) with 2D-mammography on radiologists' true-positive and false-positive detection in a population breast screening trial.
    Bernardi D, Caumo F, Macaskill P, Ciatto S, Pellegrini M, Brunelli S, Tuttobene P, Bricolo P, Fantò C, Valentini M, Montemezzi S, Houssami N.
    Eur J Cancer; 2014 May; 50(7):1232-8. PubMed ID: 24582915
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Incremental effect from integrating 3D-mammography (tomosynthesis) with 2D-mammography: Increased breast cancer detection evident for screening centres in a population-based trial.
    Caumo F, Bernardi D, Ciatto S, Macaskill P, Pellegrini M, Brunelli S, Tuttobene P, Bricolo P, Fantò C, Valentini M, Montemezzi S, Houssami N.
    Breast; 2014 Feb; 23(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 24316152
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Radiologists' interpretive efficiency and variability in true- and false-positive detection when screen-reading with tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) relative to standard mammography in population screening.
    Svahn TM, Macaskill P, Houssami N.
    Breast; 2015 Dec; 24(6):687-93. PubMed ID: 26433751
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Interval breast cancers in the 'screening with tomosynthesis or standard mammography' (STORM) population-based trial.
    Houssami N, Bernardi D, Caumo F, Brunelli S, Fantò C, Valentini M, Romanucci G, Gentilini MA, Zorzi M, Macaskill P.
    Breast; 2018 Apr; 38():150-153. PubMed ID: 29328943
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis (3D mammography) with acquired or synthetic 2D mammography compared with 2D mammography alone (STORM-2): a population-based prospective study.
    Bernardi D, Macaskill P, Pellegrini M, Valentini M, Fantò C, Ostillio L, Tuttobene P, Luparia A, Houssami N.
    Lancet Oncol; 2016 Aug; 17(8):1105-1113. PubMed ID: 27345635
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) screening: A pictorial review of screen-detected cancers and false recalls attributed to tomosynthesis in prospective screening trials.
    Houssami N, Lång K, Bernardi D, Tagliafico A, Zackrisson S, Skaane P.
    Breast; 2016 Apr; 26():119-34. PubMed ID: 27017251
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST): a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study.
    Zackrisson S, Lång K, Rosso A, Johnson K, Dustler M, Förnvik D, Förnvik H, Sartor H, Timberg P, Tingberg A, Andersson I.
    Lancet Oncol; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1493-1503. PubMed ID: 30322817
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Discordant and false-negative interpretations at digital breast tomosynthesis in the prospective Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (OTST) using independent double reading.
    Skaane P, Østerås BH, Yanakiev S, Lie T, Eben EB, Gullien R, Brandal SHB.
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Jun; 34(6):3912-3923. PubMed ID: 37938385
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Clinical performance metrics of 3D digital breast tomosynthesis compared with 2D digital mammography for breast cancer screening in community practice.
    Greenberg JS, Javitt MC, Katzen J, Michael S, Holland AE.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):687-93. PubMed ID: 24918774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Prospective study aiming to compare 2D mammography and tomosynthesis + synthesized mammography in terms of cancer detection and recall. From double reading of 2D mammography to single reading of tomosynthesis.
    Romero Martín S, Raya Povedano JL, Cara García M, Santos Romero AL, Pedrosa Garriguet M, Álvarez Benito M.
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Jun; 28(6):2484-2491. PubMed ID: 29294150
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Early clinical experience with digital breast tomosynthesis for screening mammography.
    Durand MA, Haas BM, Yao X, Geisel JL, Raghu M, Hooley RJ, Horvath LJ, Philpotts LE.
    Radiology; 2015 Jan; 274(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 25188431
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program.
    Skaane P, Bandos AI, Gullien R, Eben EB, Ekseth U, Haakenaasen U, Izadi M, Jebsen IN, Jahr G, Krager M, Niklason LT, Hofvind S, Gur D.
    Radiology; 2013 Apr; 267(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 23297332
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A prospective comparative trial of adjunct screening with tomosynthesis or ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts (ASTOUND-2).
    Tagliafico AS, Mariscotti G, Valdora F, Durando M, Nori J, La Forgia D, Rosenberg I, Caumo F, Gandolfo N, Sormani MP, Signori A, Calabrese M, Houssami N.
    Eur J Cancer; 2018 Nov; 104():39-46. PubMed ID: 30316869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Screening: The Reggio Emilia Tomosynthesis Randomized Trial.
    Pattacini P, Nitrosi A, Giorgi Rossi P, Iotti V, Ginocchi V, Ravaioli S, Vacondio R, Braglia L, Cavuto S, Campari C, RETomo Working GroupFrom the Radiology Unit (P.P., V.I., V.G., S.R., R.V.), Medical Physics Unit (A.N.), Epidemiology Unit (P.G.R.), Scientific Directorate (L.B., S.C.), and Screening Coordinating Centre (C.C.), AUSL Reggio Emilia, IRCCS, Via Amendola 2, Reggio Emilia 42122, Italy..
    Radiology; 2018 Aug; 288(2):375-385. PubMed ID: 29869961
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.