These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
182 related items for PubMed ID: 28118155
1. The effects of human height and mass on the calculated induced electric fields at 50 Hz for comparison with the EMF Directive 2013/35/EU. Findlay RP. J Radiol Prot; 2017 Mar 20; 37(1):201-213. PubMed ID: 28118155 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiofrequency Exposures of Workers on Low-Power FM Radio Transmitters. Valic B, Kos B, Gajšek P. Ann Work Expo Health; 2017 May 01; 61(4):457-467. PubMed ID: 28355437 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Simple estimation of induced electric fields in nervous system tissues for human exposure to non-uniform electric fields at power frequency. Tarao H, Miyamoto H, Korpinen L, Hayashi N, Isaka K. Phys Med Biol; 2016 Jun 21; 61(12):4438-51. PubMed ID: 27222929 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Numerical assessment of induced electric fields in a worker's hand with commonly used metallic implants under exposure to low frequency magnetic fields. Schmid G, Schneeweiss P, Hirtl R, Jhala T, Samaras T. J Radiol Prot; 2024 Aug 02; 44(3):. PubMed ID: 39047759 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the Influence of Magnetic Field on Female Users of an Induction Hob in Ergonomically Sound Exposure Situations. Gryz K, Karpowicz J, Zradziński P. Bioelectromagnetics; 2020 Oct 02; 41(7):500-510. PubMed ID: 32726484 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Inconsistency of a recently proposed method for assessing magnetic field exposure for protection against peripheral nerve stimulation in occupational situations. Schmid G, Hirtl R. J Radiol Prot; 2016 Dec 02; 36(4):N77-N88. PubMed ID: 27893442 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Difficulties in applying numerical simulations to an evaluation of occupational hazards caused by electromagnetic fields. Zradziński P. Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2015 Dec 02; 21(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 26323781 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Systematic Numerical Analysis of Magnetic Field Partial Body Exposure and Comparison With Occupational Exposure Limit Values According to European Directive 2013/35/EU. Hirtl R, Schmid G. Health Phys; 2017 Nov 02; 113(5):404-410. PubMed ID: 28961589 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Assessment of the portable radiophone users' exposure to electromagnetic fields, with use of numerical simulations and directive 2013/35/EU requirements]. Zradziński P, Leszko W, Karpowicz J, Gryz K. Med Pr; 2013 Nov 02; 64(6):817-27. PubMed ID: 24645567 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Calculated SAR distributions in a human voxel phantom due to the reflection of electromagnetic fields from a ground plane between 65 MHz and 2 GHz. Findlay RP, Dimbylow PJ. Phys Med Biol; 2008 May 07; 53(9):2277-89. PubMed ID: 18401062 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The relationship between anatomically correct electric and magnetic field dosimetry and publishe delectric and magnetic field exposure limits. Kavet R, Dovan T, Reilly JP. Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Dec 07; 152(4):279-95. PubMed ID: 22619351 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of biological effects, dosimetric models, and exposure assessment related to ELF electric- and magnetic-field guidelines. Kavet R, Stuchly MA, Bailey WH, Bracken TD. Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2001 Dec 07; 16(12):1118-38. PubMed ID: 11783873 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]