These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

785 related items for PubMed ID: 28137699

  • 1. Frequency-dependent fine structure in the frequency-following response: The byproduct of multiple generators.
    Tichko P, Skoe E.
    Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():1-15. PubMed ID: 28137699
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Differential Group Delay of the Frequency Following Response Measured Vertically and Horizontally.
    King A, Hopkins K, Plack CJ.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Apr; 17(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 26920344
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Origins of the scalp recorded frequency-following response in the cat.
    Gardi J, Merzenich M, McKean C.
    Audiology; 1979 Apr; 18(5):358-81. PubMed ID: 496719
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. No evidence for ITD-specific adaptation in the frequency following response.
    Gockel HE, Muhammed L, Farooq R, Plack CJ, Carlyon RP.
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013 Apr; 787():231-8. PubMed ID: 23716228
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Correlation between the frequency difference limen and an index based on principal component analysis of the frequency-following response of normal hearing listeners.
    Zhang X, Gong Q.
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():255-264. PubMed ID: 27956352
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Neural generators of the frequency-following response elicited to stimuli of low and high frequency: A magnetoencephalographic (MEG) study.
    Gorina-Careta N, Kurkela JLO, Hämäläinen J, Astikainen P, Escera C.
    Neuroimage; 2021 May 01; 231():117866. PubMed ID: 33592244
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Correlated brain stem and cortical evoked responses to auditory tone change.
    Galbraith GC, Gutterson RP, Levy DS, Mussey JL, Sabatasso FA, Wasserman RI.
    Neuroreport; 2004 Dec 03; 15(17):2613-6. PubMed ID: 15570162
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The frequency-following response to continuous tones in humans.
    Batra R, Kuwada S, Maher VL.
    Hear Res; 1986 Dec 03; 21(2):167-77. PubMed ID: 3700255
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Simultaneously-evoked auditory potentials (SEAP): A new method for concurrent measurement of cortical and subcortical auditory-evoked activity.
    Slugocki C, Bosnyak D, Trainor LJ.
    Hear Res; 2017 Mar 03; 345():30-42. PubMed ID: 28043881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA, Lister JJ, Frisch SA.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug 03; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Response properties of the human frequency-following response (FFR) to speech and non-speech sounds: level dependence, adaptation and phase-locking limits.
    Bidelman G, Powers L.
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Sep 03; 57(9):665-672. PubMed ID: 29764252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Changes in pitch height elicit both language-universal and language-dependent changes in neural representation of pitch in the brainstem and auditory cortex.
    Krishnan A, Suresh CH, Gandour JT.
    Neuroscience; 2017 Mar 27; 346():52-63. PubMed ID: 28108254
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Multichannel recordings of the human brainstem frequency-following response: scalp topography, source generators, and distinctions from the transient ABR.
    Bidelman GM.
    Hear Res; 2015 May 27; 323():68-80. PubMed ID: 25660195
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Subcortical sources dominate the neuroelectric auditory frequency-following response to speech.
    Bidelman GM.
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jul 15; 175():56-69. PubMed ID: 29604459
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Dichotic phase effects on frequency following responses reveal phase variant and invariant harmonic distortion products.
    Gnanateja GN, Maruthy S.
    Hear Res; 2019 Sep 01; 380():84-99. PubMed ID: 31212114
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The auditory evoked magnetic fields to very high frequency tones.
    Fujioka T, Kakigi R, Gunji A, Takeshima Y.
    Neuroscience; 2002 Sep 01; 112(2):367-81. PubMed ID: 12044454
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Analysis of the frequency following response in the cat.
    Davis RL, Britt RH.
    Hear Res; 1984 Jul 01; 15(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 6480521
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Oscillatory Entrainment of the Frequency-following Response in Auditory Cortical and Subcortical Structures.
    Coffey EBJ, Arseneau-Bruneau I, Zhang X, Baillet S, Zatorre RJ.
    J Neurosci; 2021 May 05; 41(18):4073-4087. PubMed ID: 33731448
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Cross-correlation and latency compensation analysis of click-evoked and frequency-following brain-stem responses in man.
    Galbraith GC, Brown WS.
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990 May 05; 77(4):295-308. PubMed ID: 1695141
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Putative measure of peripheral and brainstem frequency-following in humans.
    Galbraith GC, Threadgill MR, Hemsley J, Salour K, Songdej N, Ton J, Cheung L.
    Neurosci Lett; 2000 Oct 06; 292(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 10998564
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 40.