These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
450 related items for PubMed ID: 28152076
1. Do picture-based charts overestimate visual acuity? Comparison of Kay Pictures, Lea Symbols, HOTV and Keeler logMAR charts with Sloan letters in adults and children. Anstice NS, Jacobs RJ, Simkin SK, Thomson M, Thompson B, Collins AV. PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0170839. PubMed ID: 28152076 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Crowded letter and crowded picture logMAR acuity in children with amblyopia: a quantitative comparison. O'Boyle C, Chen SI, Little JA. Br J Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 101(4):457-461. PubMed ID: 27388249 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of printed and computerised crowded Kay picture logMAR tests against gold standard ETDRS acuity test chart measurements in adult and amblyopic paediatric subjects. Shah N, Laidlaw DA, Rashid S, Hysi P. Eye (Lond); 2012 Apr; 26(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 22193878 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of optotypes of Amsterdam Picture Chart with those of Tumbling-E, LEA symbols, ETDRS, and Landolt-C in non-amblyopic and amblyopic patients. Engin O, Despriet DD, van der Meulen-Schot HM, Romers A, Slot X, Sang MT, Fronius M, Kelderman H, Simonsz HJ. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 252(12):2013-20. PubMed ID: 25228066 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the amblyopia treatment study HOTV and electronic-early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study visual acuity protocols in children aged 5 to 12 years. Rice ML, Leske DA, Holmes JM. Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Feb; 137(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 14962417 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Threshold visual acuity testing of preschool children using the crowded HOTV and Lea Symbols acuity tests. Cyert L, Schmidt P, Maguire M, Moore B, Dobson V, Quinn G, Vision in Preschoolers (VIP) Study Group. J AAPOS; 2003 Dec; 7(6):396-9. PubMed ID: 14730291 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Agreement between Lea Symbols and Patti Pics visual acuity in children and adults. Sapkota A, Sitaula S, Shrestha GS, Joshi ND, Koirala B, Paudel N. J Optom; 2023 Dec; 16(3):229-235. PubMed ID: 36717317 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of visual acuity measurements via three different methods in preschool children: Lea symbols, crowded Lea symbols, Snellen E chart. Inal A, Ocak OB, Aygit ED, Yilmaz I, Inal B, Taskapili M, Gokyigit B. Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 38(4):1385-1391. PubMed ID: 28639088 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Patti Pics and Lea Symbols optotypes in children and adults. Mercer ME, Drover JR, Penney KJ, Courage ML, Adams RJ. Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Mar; 90(3):236-41. PubMed ID: 23376895 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Visual Acuity Testing Using a Random Method Visual Acuity Application. Rhiu S, Lee HJ, Goo YS, Cho K, Kim JH. Telemed J E Health; 2016 Mar; 22(3):232-7. PubMed ID: 26280910 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the HOTV and Lea symbols visual acuity tests in patients with amblyopia. Ruttum MS, Dahlgren M. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2006 Mar; 43(3):157-60. PubMed ID: 16761636 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]