These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


141 related items for PubMed ID: 28160471

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Treating Class II malocclusion in children. Vertical skeletal effects of high-pull or low-pull headgear during comprehensive orthodontic treatment and retention.
    Antonarakis GS, Kiliaridis S.
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 May; 18(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 25545335
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Prevalence of third molar impaction in orthodontic patients treated nonextraction and with extraction of 4 premolars.
    Kim TW, Artun J, Behbehani F, Artese F.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Feb; 123(2):138-45. PubMed ID: 12594419
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of the dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes with the cervical headgear and Jones Jig followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion patients: A retrospective study.
    Fontes FPH, Bellini-Pereira SA, Aliaga-Del-Castillo A, Patel MP, Freitas MR, Henriques JFC, Janson G.
    Int Orthod; 2020 Sep; 18(3):424-435. PubMed ID: 32278665
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Molar changes with cervical headgear alone or in combination with rapid maxillary expansion.
    Marchiori Farret M, de Lima EM, Pereira Araújo V, Deon Rizzatto SM, Macedo de Menezes L, Lima Grossi M.
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):847-51. PubMed ID: 18298206
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Long- and short-term effects of headgear traction with and without the maxillary second molars.
    Shpack N, Brosh T, Mazor Y, Shapinko Y, Davidovitch M, Sarig R, Reimann S, Bourauel C, Vardimon AD.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Oct; 146(4):467-76. PubMed ID: 25263150
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Third molar angulation during and after treatment of adolescent orthodontic patients.
    Artun J, Thalib L, Little RM.
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 27(6):590-6. PubMed ID: 16009666
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effects of cervical headgear and fixed appliances on the space available for maxillary second molars.
    Piva LM, Brito HH, Leite HR, O'Reilly M.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Sep; 128(3):366-71. PubMed ID: 16168333
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Differences in third molar development and angulation in class II subdivision malocclusions.
    Sunal Akturk E, Seker ED, Akman S, Kurt G.
    J Orofac Orthop; 2023 Jul; 84(4):235-242. PubMed ID: 34586435
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Long-term skeletal effects of high-pull headgear followed by fixed appliances for the treatment of Class II malocclusions.
    Bilbo EE, Marshall SD, Southard KA, Allareddy V, Holton N, Thames AM, Otsby MS, Southard TE.
    Angle Orthod; 2018 Sep; 88(5):530-537. PubMed ID: 29667470
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.