These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

639 related items for PubMed ID: 28169094

  • 21. Objective Evaluation of Presbyphonia: Spectroacoustic Study on 142 Patients with Praat.
    Mezzedimi C, Di Francesco M, Livi W, Spinosi MC, De Felice C.
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):257.e25-257.e32. PubMed ID: 27427181
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Comparison of Cepstral Analysis Based on Voiced-Segment Extraction and Voice Tasks for Discriminating Dysphonic and Normophonic Korean Speakers.
    Kim GH, Bae IH, Park HJ, Lee YW.
    J Voice; 2021 Mar; 35(2):328.e11-328.e22. PubMed ID: 31640898
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Intertext Variability of Smoothed Cepstral Peak Prominence, Methods to Control It, and Its Diagnostic Properties.
    Kitayama I, Hosokawa K, Iwahashi T, Iwahashi M, Iwaki S, Kato C, Yoshida M, Umatani M, Matsushiro N, Ogawa M, Inohara H.
    J Voice; 2020 May; 34(3):305-319. PubMed ID: 30389189
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Correlation of the Iranian Voice Quality of Life Profile (IVQLP) with Acoustic Measurements across Three Common Voice Disorders.
    Dehqan A, Scherer RC, Yadegari F, Dashti G.
    J Voice; 2018 Jul; 32(4):514.e7-514.e11. PubMed ID: 28965662
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Voice disorder discrimination using vowel acoustic measures in female speakers.
    Nguyen DD, Novakovic D, Madill C.
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2024 Jul; 59(5):2087-2102. PubMed ID: 38884559
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. The Exploration of an Objective Model for Roughness With Several Acoustic Markers.
    Latoszek BBV, De Bodt M, Gerrits E, Maryn Y.
    J Voice; 2018 Mar; 32(2):149-161. PubMed ID: 28572016
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Cepstral analysis of hypokinetic and ataxic voices: correlations with perceptual and other acoustic measures.
    Jannetts S, Lowit A.
    J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 24836365
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. A Cepstral Peak Prominence (CPP) Voice Analysis in Iranian Post-lingual Deaf Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
    Aghaei F, Khoramshahi H, Zamani P, Dehqan A, Hesam S.
    J Voice; 2024 May; 38(3):795.e11-795.e20. PubMed ID: 34857450
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. The Validity of Cepstral Analysis to Distinguish Between Different Levels of Perceptual Dysphonia in the Persian Vocal Tasks.
    Saeedi S, Aghajanzadeh M, Khoddami SM, Dabirmoghaddam P, Jalaie S.
    J Voice; 2024 Nov; 38(6):1523.e9-1523.e16. PubMed ID: 35599059
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Toward validation of the cepstral spectral index of dysphonia (CSID) as an objective treatment outcomes measure.
    Peterson EA, Roy N, Awan SN, Merrill RM, Banks R, Tanner K.
    J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 23809565
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Use of cepstral analysis for differentiating dysphonic from normal voices in children.
    Esen Aydinli F, Özcebe E, İncebay Ö.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Jan; 116():107-113. PubMed ID: 30554679
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Perceptual structure of adductor spasmodic dysphonia and its acoustic correlates.
    Cannito MP, Doiuchi M, Murry T, Woodson GE.
    J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):818.e5-13. PubMed ID: 23177751
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Pitch Strength as an Outcome Measure for Treatment of Dysphonia.
    Kopf LM, Jackson-Menaldi C, Rubin AD, Skeffington J, Hunter EJ, Skowronski MD, Shrivastav R.
    J Voice; 2017 Nov; 31(6):691-696. PubMed ID: 28318967
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Acoustic analysis of four common voice diagnoses: moving toward disorder-specific assessment.
    Gillespie AI, Dastolfo C, Magid N, Gartner-Schmidt J.
    J Voice; 2014 Sep; 28(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 24880672
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Responsiveness of Persian Version of Consensus Auditory Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V), Persian Version of Voice Handicap Index (VHI), and Praat in Vocal Mass Lesions with Muscle Tension Dysphonia.
    Khoramshahi H, Khatoonabadi AR, Khoddami SM, Dabirmoghaddam P, Ansari NN.
    J Voice; 2018 Nov; 32(6):770.e21-770.e30. PubMed ID: 29029830
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Cepstral Peak Prominence Values for Clinical Voice Evaluation.
    Murton O, Hillman R, Mehta D.
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2020 Aug 04; 29(3):1596-1607. PubMed ID: 32658592
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Assessment of dysphonia: cepstral analysis versus conventional acoustic analysis.
    Hassan EM, Abdel Hady AF, Shohdi SS, Eldessouky HM, Din MHB.
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2021 Oct 04; 46(3):99-109. PubMed ID: 32436465
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Acoustic Perturbation Measures Improve with Increasing Vocal Intensity in Individuals With and Without Voice Disorders.
    Brockmann-Bauser M, Bohlender JE, Mehta DD.
    J Voice; 2018 Mar 04; 32(2):162-168. PubMed ID: 28528786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 32.