These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
530 related items for PubMed ID: 28177655
1. Iterative Image Reconstruction Improves the Accuracy of Automated Plaque Burden Assessment in Coronary CT Angiography: A Comparison With Intravascular Ultrasound. Puchner SB, Ferencik M, Maehara A, Stolzmann P, Ma S, Do S, Kauczor HU, Mintz GS, Hoffmann U, Schlett CL. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Apr; 208(4):777-784. PubMed ID: 28177655 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Iterative image reconstruction algorithms in coronary CT angiography improve the detection of lipid-core plaque--a comparison with histology. Puchner SB, Ferencik M, Maurovich-Horvat P, Nakano M, Otsuka F, Kauczor HU, Virmani R, Hoffmann U, Schlett CL. Eur Radiol; 2015 Jan; 25(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 25182630 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Variability and accuracy of coronary CT angiography including use of iterative reconstruction algorithms for plaque burden assessment as compared with intravascular ultrasound-an ex vivo study. Stolzmann P, Schlett CL, Maurovich-Horvat P, Maehara A, Ma S, Scheffel H, Engel LC, Károlyi M, Mintz GS, Hoffmann U. Eur Radiol; 2012 Oct; 22(10):2067-75. PubMed ID: 22622346 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Head-to-head comparison of adaptive statistical and model-based iterative reconstruction algorithms for submillisievert coronary CT angiography. Benz DC, Fuchs TA, Gräni C, Studer Bruengger AA, Clerc OF, Mikulicic F, Messerli M, Stehli J, Possner M, Pazhenkottil AP, Gaemperli O, Kaufmann PA, Buechel RR. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Feb 01; 19(2):193-198. PubMed ID: 28200212 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of iterative image reconstruction algorithms on the feasibility of automated plaque assessment in coronary CT angiography. Puchner SB, Ferencik M, Karolyi M, Do S, Maurovich-Horvat P, Kauczor HU, Hoffmann U, Schlett CL. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Dec 01; 29(8):1879-88. PubMed ID: 23990390 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Coronary artery plaques: cardiac CT with model-based and adaptive-statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Scheffel H, Stolzmann P, Schlett CL, Engel LC, Major GP, Károlyi M, Do S, Maurovich-Horvat P, Hoffmann U. Eur J Radiol; 2012 Mar 01; 81(3):e363-9. PubMed ID: 22197733 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Implications of computed tomography reconstruction algorithms on coronary atheroma quantification: Comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Ramasamy A, Hamid A Khan A, Cooper J, Simon J, Maurovich-Horvat P, Bajaj R, Kitslaar P, Amersey R, Jain A, Deaner A, Reiber JH, Moon JC, Dijkstra J, Serruys PW, Mathur A, Baumbach A, Torii R, Pugliese F, Bourantas CV. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2023 Mar 01; 17(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 36270952 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction on coronary plaque analysis in coronary computed tomography angiography. Precht H, Kitslaar PH, Broersen A, Dijkstra J, Gerke O, Thygesen J, Egstrup K, Lambrechtsen J. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016 Mar 01; 10(6):507-516. PubMed ID: 27769663 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Image quality of CT angiography with model-based iterative reconstruction in young children with congenital heart disease: comparison with filtered back projection and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. Son SS, Choo KS, Jeon UB, Jeon GR, Nam KJ, Kim TU, Yeom JA, Hwang JY, Jeong DW, Lim SJ. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jun 01; 31 Suppl 1():31-8. PubMed ID: 25414055 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. First experiences with model based iterative reconstructions influence on quantitative plaque volume and intensity measurements in coronary computed tomography angiography. Precht H, Kitslaar PH, Broersen A, Gerke O, Dijkstra J, Thygesen J, Egstrup K, Lambrechtsen J. Radiography (Lond); 2017 Feb 01; 23(1):77-79. PubMed ID: 28290345 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of a model-based, iterative reconstruction algorithm (MBIR) regarding image quality and dose reduction in liver computed tomography. Chang W, Lee JM, Lee K, Yoon JH, Yu MH, Han JK, Choi BI. Invest Radiol; 2013 Aug 01; 48(8):598-606. PubMed ID: 23511193 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the effect of iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection on cardiac CT postprocessing. Spears JR, Schoepf UJ, Henzler T, Joshi G, Moscariello A, Vliegenthart R, Cho YJ, Apfaltrer P, Rowe G, Weininger M, Ebersberger U. Acad Radiol; 2014 Mar 01; 21(3):318-24. PubMed ID: 24360635 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of pure and hybrid iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: image quality assessment in the cervicothoracic region. Katsura M, Sato J, Akahane M, Matsuda I, Ishida M, Yasaka K, Kunimatsu A, Ohtomo K. Eur J Radiol; 2013 Feb 01; 82(2):356-60. PubMed ID: 23199752 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques in quantifying coronary calcium. Takahashi M, Kimura F, Umezawa T, Watanabe Y, Ogawa H. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016 Feb 01; 10(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 26276567 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of Coronary Plaque Detection and Assessment of Interobserver Agreement for Plaque Quantification Using Automatic Coronary Plaque Analysis Software on Coronary CT Angiography. Laqmani A, Klink T, Quitzke M, Creder DD, Adam G, Lund G. Rofo; 2016 Oct 01; 188(10):933-9. PubMed ID: 27433968 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]