These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

202 related items for PubMed ID: 281872

  • 1. A cephalometric evaluation of high-pull molar headgear and face-bow neck strap therapy.
    Brown P.
    Am J Orthod; 1978 Dec; 74(6):621-32. PubMed ID: 281872
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The effects of extraction and nonextraction treatment on the mandibular position.
    Yamaguchi K, Nanda RS.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Nov; 100(5):443-52. PubMed ID: 1951197
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A cephalometric appraisal of edgewise Class II nonextraction treatment with extraoral force.
    Cangialosi TJ, Meistrell ME, Leung MA, Ko JY.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1988 Apr; 93(4):315-24. PubMed ID: 3162641
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Quantitative analysis of the orthodontic and orthopedic effects of maxillary traction.
    Baumrind S, Korn EL, Isaacson RJ, West EE, Molthen R.
    Am J Orthod; 1983 Nov; 84(5):384-98. PubMed ID: 6579840
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
    Yao CC, Lai EH, Chang JZ, Chen I, Chen YJ.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. An evaluation of extraoral combined high-pull traction and cervical traction to the maxilla.
    Badell MC.
    Am J Orthod; 1976 Apr; 69(4):431-46. PubMed ID: 1062938
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effects of cervical anchorage during and after treatment: an implant study.
    Melsen B.
    Am J Orthod; 1978 May; 73(5):526-40. PubMed ID: 277067
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The role of cervical headgear and lower utility arch in the control of the vertical dimension.
    Ulger G, Arun T, Sayinsu K, Isik F.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Oct; 130(4):492-501. PubMed ID: 17045149
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Mixed dentition treatment with cervical traction and lower lingual arch.
    Odom WM.
    Angle Orthod; 1983 Oct; 53(4):329-42. PubMed ID: 6580833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A growth-related concept for skeletal class II treatment.
    Teuscher U.
    Am J Orthod; 1978 Sep; 74(3):258-75. PubMed ID: 281130
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A cephalometric study to compare the effects of cervical traction and Andresen therapy in the treatment of class II division 1 malocclusion. Part 2--Dentoalveolar changes.
    Derringer K.
    Br J Orthod; 1990 May; 17(2):89-99. PubMed ID: 2357464
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Upper headgear versus lower headgear, yokes, and class III elastics.
    Osvaldik-Trapl M, Droschl H.
    Angle Orthod; 1978 Jan; 48(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 272132
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The headgear effect of the Herbst appliance: a cephalometric long-term study.
    Pancherz H, Anehus-Pancherz M.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Jun; 103(6):510-20. PubMed ID: 8506812
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Cephalometric analysis of molar and anterior tooth movement during cervical headgear treatment in relation to growth patterns.
    Godt A, Berneburg M, Kalwitzki M, Göz G.
    J Orofac Orthop; 2008 May; 69(3):189-200. PubMed ID: 18506404
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Control of the vertical dimension in Class II correction using a cervical headgear and lower utility arch in growing patients. Part I.
    Cook AH, Sellke TA, BeGole EA.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Oct; 106(4):376-88. PubMed ID: 7942653
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A cephalometric evaluation of nonextraction cervical headgear treatment in Class II malocclusions.
    Hubbard GW, Nanda RS, Currier GF.
    Angle Orthod; 1994 Oct; 64(5):359-70. PubMed ID: 7802330
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Protraction of the maxillofacial complex.
    Mermigos J, Full CA, Andreasen G.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Jul; 98(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 2363406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Treating Class II malocclusion in children. Vertical skeletal effects of high-pull or low-pull headgear during comprehensive orthodontic treatment and retention.
    Antonarakis GS, Kiliaridis S.
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 May; 18(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 25545335
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.