These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


686 related items for PubMed ID: 28191792

  • 1. Laparoscopic management of recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction following pyeloplasty: a single surgical team experience with 38 cases.
    Chiancone F, Fedelini M, Pucci L, Meccariello C, Fedelini P.
    Int Braz J Urol; 2017; 43(3):512-517. PubMed ID: 28191792
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus open pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.
    Abdel-Karim AM, Fahmy A, Moussa A, Rashad H, Elbadry M, Badawy H, Hammady A.
    J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Dec; 12(6):401.e1-401.e6. PubMed ID: 27614698
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Sundaram CP, Grubb RL, Rehman J, Yan Y, Chen C, Landman J, McDougall EM, Clayman RV.
    J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2037-40. PubMed ID: 12771713
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of open and laparoscopic pyeloplasty in ureteropelvic junction obstruction surgery: report of 49 cases.
    Umari P, Lissiani A, Trombetta C, Belgrano E.
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2011 Dec; 83(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 22670313
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Laparoscopic treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in five pediatric cases of pelvic kidneys.
    Muller CO, Blanc T, Peycelon M, El Ghoneimi A.
    J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Dec; 11(6):353.e1-5. PubMed ID: 26233554
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Comparison of three dimensional and two dimentional laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction].
    Xu W, Li H, Ji Z, Zhang X, Zhang Y, Xiao H, Liu G.
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Oct; 52(10):771-4. PubMed ID: 25573218
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Failed pyeloplasty in children: Is robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair feasible?
    Asensio M, Gander R, Royo GF, Lloret J.
    J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):69.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25791423
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Global minimally invasive pyeloplasty study in children: Results from the Pediatric Urology Expert Group of the European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists working party.
    Silay MS, Spinoit AF, Undre S, Fiala V, Tandogdu Z, Garmanova T, Guttilla A, Sancaktutar AA, Haid B, Waldert M, Goyal A, Serefoglu EC, Baldassarre E, Manzoni G, Radford A, Subramaniam R, Cherian A, Hoebeke P, Jacobs M, Rocco B, Yuriy R, Zattoni F, Kocvara R, Koh CJ.
    J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Aug; 12(4):229.e1-7. PubMed ID: 27346071
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: technique and results in 80 consecutive patients.
    Castillo OA, Cabrera W, Aleman E, Vidal-Mora I, Yañez R.
    Actas Urol Esp; 2014 Mar; 38(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 23910728
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Robotic computer-assisted pyeloplasty versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
    Weise ES, Winfield HN.
    J Endourol; 2006 Oct; 20(10):813-9. PubMed ID: 17094760
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Feasibility analysis of laparoscopic transperitoneal and transmesenteric pyeloplasty in recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction].
    Zhou LQ, Zhang ZY, Li XS, He ZS.
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2011 Aug 18; 43(4):540-3. PubMed ID: 21844962
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Minimally Invasive Treatment of Pediatric Extrinsic Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction by Crossing Polar Vessels: Is Vascular Hitching a Definitive Solution? Report of a Multicenter Survey.
    Chiarenza SF, Bleve C, Caione P, Escolino M, Nappo SG, Perretta R, La Manna A, Esposito C.
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2017 Sep 18; 27(9):965-971. PubMed ID: 28590826
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Feasibility and safety of retroperitoneal laparoendoscopic single-site dismembered pyeloplasty: a clinical report of 10 cases.
    Chen Z, Chen X, Wu ZH, Luo YC, He Y, Li NN, Xie CQ, Lai C.
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2012 Sep 18; 22(7):685-90. PubMed ID: 22845552
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Which is better--retroperitoneoscopic or laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children?
    Canon SJ, Jayanthi VR, Lowe GJ.
    J Urol; 2007 Oct 18; 178(4 Pt 2):1791-5; discussion 1795. PubMed ID: 17707427
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Infant Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty: Outcomes at a Single Institution, and Tips for Safety and Success.
    Andolfi C, Rodríguez VM, Galansky L, Gundeti MS.
    Eur Urol; 2021 Nov 18; 80(5):621-631. PubMed ID: 34247895
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Equivocal ureteropelvic junction obstruction on diuretic renogram--should minimally invasive pyeloplasty be offered to symptomatic patients?
    Ozayar A, Friedlander JI, Shakir NA, Gahan JC, Cadeddu JA, Morgan MS.
    J Urol; 2015 Apr 18; 193(4):1278-82. PubMed ID: 25444983
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Hydronephrosis: Comparison of extrinsic vessel versus intrinsic ureteropelvic junction obstruction groups and a plea against the vascular hitch procedure.
    Menon P, Rao KL, Sodhi KS, Bhattacharya A, Saxena AK, Mittal BR.
    J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr 18; 11(2):80.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25794866
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Our experience with retroperitoneal and transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction.
    Davenport K, Minervini A, Timoney AG, Keeley FX.
    Eur Urol; 2005 Dec 18; 48(6):973-7. PubMed ID: 16171940
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the worst case scenario: after both failed open repair and endoscopic salvage.
    Levin BM, Herrell SD.
    J Endourol; 2006 Oct 18; 20(10):808-12. PubMed ID: 17094759
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 35.