These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. In vitro evaluation of a ball-and-socket cervical disc prosthesis with cranial geometric center. Barrey C, Mosnier T, Jund J, Perrin G, Skalli W. J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Nov; 11(5):538-46. PubMed ID: 19929355 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The facet joint loading profile of a cervical intervertebral disc replacement incorporating a novel saddle-shaped articulation. Stieber JR, Quirno M, Kang M, Valdevit A, Errico TJ. J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Oct; 24(7):432-6. PubMed ID: 21336178 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics. Cunningham BW, Hu N, Zorn CM, McAfee PC. Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Hybrid Constructs for Performing Three-level Hybrid Surgery: A Finite Element Study. Li Y, Zhu J, Liao Z, Zhang Z, Liu W. World Neurosurg; 2018 Jun; 114():e1302-e1309. PubMed ID: 29627629 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Biomechanical analysis of single- and double-level cervical disc arthroplasty using finite element modeling. Rahman WU, Jiang W, Zhao F, Li Z, Wang G, Yang G. Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2023 Jan; 237(1):91-103. PubMed ID: 36394294 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Stabilization with the Dynamic Cervical Implant: a novel treatment approach following cervical discectomy and decompression. Matgé G, Berthold C, Gunness VR, Hana A, Hertel F. J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Mar; 22(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 25555050 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Cervical disc prostheses need a variable center of rotation for flexion / extension below disc level, plus a separate COR for lateral bending above disc level to more closely replicate in-vivo motion: MRI-based biomechanical in-vivo study. Muhlbauer MK, Tomasch E, Sinz W, Trattnig S, Steffan H. BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Mar 08; 23(1):227. PubMed ID: 35260131 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Can an Endplate-conformed Cervical Cage Provide a Better Biomechanical Environment than a Typical Non-conformed Cage?: A Finite Element Model and Cadaver Study. Zhang F, Xu HC, Yin B, Xia XL, Ma XS, Wang HL, Yin J, Shao MH, Lyu FZ, Jiang JY. Orthop Surg; 2016 Aug 08; 8(3):367-76. PubMed ID: 27627721 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]