These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

205 related items for PubMed ID: 28220497

  • 1. Round window stimulation with the Vibrant Soundbridge: Comparison of direct and indirect coupling.
    Olszewski L, Jedrzejczak WW, Piotrowska A, Skarzynski H.
    Laryngoscope; 2017 Dec; 127(12):2843-2849. PubMed ID: 28220497
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of Alternative Coupling Methods of the Vibrant Soundbridge Floating Mass Transducer.
    Busch S, Lenarz T, Maier H.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2016 Dec; 21(6):347-355. PubMed ID: 28068651
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A comparative study of hearing aids and round window application of the vibrant sound bridge (VSB) for patients with mixed or conductive hearing loss.
    Marino R, Linton N, Eikelboom RH, Statham E, Rajan GP.
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Apr; 52(4):209-18. PubMed ID: 23527900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Impact of floating mass transducer coupling and positioning in round window vibroplasty.
    Rajan GP, Lampacher P, Ambett R, Dittrich G, Kuthubutheen J, Wood B, McArthur A, Marino R.
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Feb; 32(2):271-7. PubMed ID: 21206391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Vibroplasty in mixed and conductive hearing loss: comparison of different coupling methods.
    Vyskocil E, Riss D, Honeder C, Arnoldner C, Hamzavi JS, Baumgartner WD, Flak S, Gstoettner W.
    Laryngoscope; 2014 Jun; 124(6):1436-43. PubMed ID: 24338550
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Electrocochleography in round window Vibrant Soundbridge implantation.
    Colletti V, Mandalà M, Colletti L.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Apr; 146(4):633-40. PubMed ID: 22140205
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Functional results of Vibrant Soundbridge middle ear implants in conductive and mixed hearing losses.
    Bernardeschi D, Hoffman C, Benchaa T, Labassi S, Beliaeff M, Sterkers O, Grayeli AB.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2011 Apr; 16(6):381-7. PubMed ID: 21228566
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Benefits of active middle ear implants in mixed hearing loss: Stapes versus round window.
    Lee JM, Jung J, Moon IS, Kim SH, Choi JY.
    Laryngoscope; 2017 Jun; 127(6):1435-1441. PubMed ID: 27560038
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Functional outcomes of Vibrant Soundbridge applied on the middle ear windows in comparison with conventional hearing aids.
    Gunduz B, Atas A, Bayazıt YA, Goksu N, Gokdogan C, Tutar H.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Dec; 132(12):1306-10. PubMed ID: 23039370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Reinforced active middle ear implant fixation in incus vibroplasty.
    Mlynski R, Dalhoff E, Heyd A, Wildenstein D, Hagen R, Gummer AW, Schraven SP.
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 25099400
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Safety and effectiveness of the Vibrant Soundbridge in treating conductive and mixed hearing loss: A systematic review.
    Ernst A, Todt I, Wagner J.
    Laryngoscope; 2016 Jun; 126(6):1451-7. PubMed ID: 26468033
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Long-Term Stability and Safety of the Soundbridge Coupled to the Round Window.
    Sprinzl GM, Schoerg P, Muck S, Jesenko M, Speiser S, Ploder M, Edlinger SH, Magele A.
    Laryngoscope; 2021 May; 131(5):E1434-E1442. PubMed ID: 33210744
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Intraoperative Estimation of the Coupling Efficiency and Clinical Outcomes of the Vibrant Soundbridge Active Middle Ear Implant Using Auditory Brainstem Response Measurements.
    Geiger U, Radeloff A, Hagen R, Cebulla M.
    Am J Audiol; 2019 Sep 13; 28(3):553-559. PubMed ID: 31318578
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Treatment of the atretic ear with round window vibrant soundbridge implantation in infants and children: electrocochleography and audiologic outcomes.
    Mandalà M, Colletti L, Colletti V.
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Oct 13; 32(8):1250-5. PubMed ID: 21897320
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [The active middle ear implant for the rehabilitation of sensorineural, mixed and conductive hearing losses].
    Sprinzl GM, Wolf-Magele A, Schnabl J, Koci V.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2011 Sep 13; 90(9):560-72. PubMed ID: 21913153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Vibrant SoundBridge application to middle ear windows versus conventional hearing aids: a comparative study based on international outcome inventory for hearing aids.
    Atas A, Tutar H, Gunduz B, Bayazıt YA.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Jan 13; 271(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 23400404
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A new vibroplasty coupling technique as a treatment for conductive and mixed hearing losses: a report of 4 cases.
    Huber AM, Mlynski R, Müller J, Dillier N, Holzmann D, Wolframm MD, Hagen R.
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun 13; 33(4):613-7. PubMed ID: 22429947
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Vibrant Soundbridge middle ear implant in mixed hearing loss. Indications, techniques, results.
    Dumon T, Gratacap B, Firmin F, Vincent R, Pialoux R, Casse B, Firmin B.
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2009 Jun 13; 130(2):75-81. PubMed ID: 19813468
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Oval window membrane vibroplasty for direct acoustic cochlear stimulation: treating severe mixed hearing loss in challenging middle ears.
    Schwab B, Salcher RB, Maier H, Kontorinis G.
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jul 13; 33(5):804-9. PubMed ID: 22699990
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.