These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

205 related items for PubMed ID: 28220497

  • 21. Clinical Experience of Vibroplasty With Direct Coupling to the Oval Window Without Use of a Coupler.
    Kwak SH, Moon YM, Nam GS, Bae SH, Kim SH, Jung J, Choi JY.
    Laryngoscope; 2020 Dec; 130(12):E926-E932. PubMed ID: 31977072
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Experience with the Vibrant Soundbridge RW-Coupler for round window Vibroplasty with tympanosclerosis.
    Iwasaki S, Suzuki H, Moteki H, Miyagawa M, Takumi Y, Usami S.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Jun; 132(6):676-82. PubMed ID: 22385350
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Retrospective audiological analysis of bone conduction versus round window vibratory stimulation in patients with mixed hearing loss.
    Mojallal H, Schwab B, Hinze AL, Giere T, Lenarz T.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jun; 54(6):391-400. PubMed ID: 25735204
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. A comparative study of MED-EL FMT attachment to the long process of the incus in intact middle ears and its attachment to disarticulated stapes head.
    Chen T, Ren LJ, Yin DM, Li J, Yang L, Dai PD, Zhang TY.
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():97-103. PubMed ID: 28666703
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Consensus statement on round window vibroplasty.
    Beltrame AM, Todt I, Sprinzl G, Profant M, Schwab B.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2014 Oct; 123(10):734-40. PubMed ID: 24842869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Application of active middle ear implants in patients with severe mixed hearing loss.
    Verhaegen VJ, Mulder JJ, Cremers CW, Snik AF.
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):297-301. PubMed ID: 22366752
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Long-term outcome of round window Vibrant SoundBridge implantation in extensive ossicular chain defects.
    Colletti L, Mandalà M, Colletti V.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Jul; 149(1):134-41. PubMed ID: 23585147
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Long-Term Outcome of Hearing Rehabilitation With An Active Middle Ear Implant.
    Brkic FF, Riss D, Auinger A, Zoerner B, Arnoldner C, Baumgartner WD, Gstoettner W, Vyskocil E.
    Laryngoscope; 2019 Feb; 129(2):477-481. PubMed ID: 30284273
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Intraoperative auditory steady state response measurements during Vibrant Soundbridge middle ear implantation in patients with mixed hearing loss: preliminary results.
    Verhaegen VJ, Mulder JJ, Noten JF, Luijten BM, Cremers CW, Snik AF.
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Dec; 31(9):1365-8. PubMed ID: 20729778
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Clip vibroplasty: experimental evaluation and first clinical results.
    Hüttenbrink KB, Beutner D, Bornitz M, Luers JC, Zahnert T.
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jun; 32(4):650-3. PubMed ID: 21765388
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. [Multicenter Clinical Study of Vibrant Soundbridge in Japan: Analysis of Subjective Questionnaires].
    Kumakawa K, Kanzaki S, Usami S, Iwasaki S, Yamanaka N, Doi K, Naito Y, Gyo K, Tono T, Takahashi H, Kanda Y.
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 2015 Nov; 118(11):1309-18. PubMed ID: 26827595
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Audiologic limitations of Vibrant Soundbridge device: Is the contralateral hearing aid fitting indispensable?
    Jung J, Roh KJ, Moon IS, Kim SH, Hwang KR, Lee JM, Hou JH, Choi JY.
    Laryngoscope; 2016 Sep; 126(9):2116-23. PubMed ID: 26774568
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. The vibrant soundbridge for conductive and mixed hearing losses: European multicenter study results.
    Baumgartner WD, Böheim K, Hagen R, Müller J, Lenarz T, Reiss S, Schlögel M, Mlynski R, Mojallal H, Colletti V, Opie J.
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2010 Sep; 69():38-50. PubMed ID: 20610913
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Direct round window stimulation with the Med-El Vibrant Soundbridge: 5 years of experience using a technique without interposed fascia.
    Skarzynski H, Olszewski L, Skarzynski PH, Lorens A, Piotrowska A, Porowski M, Mrowka M, Pilka A.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Mar; 271(3):477-82. PubMed ID: 23512431
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Vibroplasty for mixed and conductive hearing loss.
    Luers JC, Hüttenbrink KB, Zahnert T, Bornitz M, Beutner D.
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1005-12. PubMed ID: 23820796
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. A retrofacial approach of round window vibroplasty during Vibrant Soundbridge implantation for patients with congenital ear malformation.
    Li J, Wang D, Zhao C, Yang L, Ren R, Zhao S.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Mar; 142():110600. PubMed ID: 33412340
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Impact of coupling techniques of an active middle ear device to the round window membrane for the backward stimulation of the cochlea.
    Gostian AO, Pazen D, Ortmann M, Luers JC, Anagiotos A, Hüttenbrink KB, Beutner D.
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jan; 36(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 25406868
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Pros and Cons of Round Window Vibroplasty in Open Cavities: Audiological, Surgical, and Quality of Life Outcomes.
    Lassaletta L, Calvino M, Sánchez-Cuadrado I, Pérez-Mora RM, Muñoz E, Gavilán J.
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jul; 36(6):944-52. PubMed ID: 25839978
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Active middle ear implants in patients undergoing subtotal petrosectomy: new application for the Vibrant Soundbridge device and its implication for lateral cranium base surgery.
    Linder T, Schlegel C, DeMin N, van der Westhuizen S.
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Jan; 30(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 18849883
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.