These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

205 related items for PubMed ID: 28220497

  • 61. Vibrant Soundbridge Implantation: Floating Mass Transducer Coupled with the Stapes Head and Embedded in Fat.
    Liu Q, Feng G, Shang Y, Wang S, Gao Z.
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2018; 80(2):59-64. PubMed ID: 29698958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 62. The Vibrant Soundbridge: A Global Overview.
    Maw J.
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 2019 Apr; 52(2):285-295. PubMed ID: 30612756
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 63. Factors improving the vibration transfer of the floating mass transducer at the round window.
    Arnold A, Stieger C, Candreia C, Pfiffner F, Kompis M.
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Jan; 31(1):122-8. PubMed ID: 19887971
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 64. Intraoperative quantification of floating mass transducer coupling quality in active middle ear implants: a multicenter study.
    Fröhlich L, Rahne T, Plontke SK, Oberhoffner T, Dahl R, Mlynski R, Dziemba O, Aristeidou A, Gadyuchko M, Koscielny S, Hoth S, Kropp MH, Mir-Salim P, Müller A.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Jul; 278(7):2277-2288. PubMed ID: 32880736
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 65.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 66. Hearing rehabilitation and microbial shift after middle ear surgery with Vibrant Soundbridge in patients with chronic otitis media.
    Bruchhage KL, Lupatsii M, Möllenkolk F, Leffers D, Kurabi A, Jürgens T, Graspeuntner S, Hollfelder D, Leichtle A.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Jul; 280(7):3107-3118. PubMed ID: 36662266
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 67. Middle Ear Active Implant Indications, Comparative Audiometric Results from Different Approaches, and Coupling with the Vibrant Soundbridge®: A Single Center Experience over More Than 20 Years.
    Lorente-Piera J, Manrique-Huarte R, Lima JP, Calavia D, Manrique M.
    Audiol Res; 2024 Aug 21; 14(4):721-735. PubMed ID: 39194417
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 68. TORP vs round window implant for hearing restoration of patients with extensive ossicular chain defect.
    Colletti V, Carner M, Colletti L.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 Apr 21; 129(4):449-52. PubMed ID: 19191049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 69. Influence of the Coupling on the Hearing Outcome After Implantation of an Active Middle Ear Implant: Comparison of the Transmission Behavior in Temporal Bone Experiments With Clinical Data.
    Müller C, Lailach S, Bornitz M, Lasurashvili N, Essinger TM, Neudert M, Zahnert T.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr 21; 44(1):135-145. PubMed ID: 35913925
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 70. Mastoid cavity obliteration and Vibrant Soundbridge implantation for patients with mixed hearing loss.
    Ihler F, Köhler S, Meyer AC, Blum J, Strenzke N, Matthias C, Canis M.
    Laryngoscope; 2014 Feb 21; 124(2):531-7. PubMed ID: 23918587
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 71. A pilot study of the safety and performance of the Otologics fully implantable hearing device: transducing sounds via the round window membrane to the inner ear.
    Lefebvre PP, Martin C, Dubreuil C, Decat M, Yazbeck A, Kasic J, Tringali S.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009 Feb 21; 14(3):172-80. PubMed ID: 19005251
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 72.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 73.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 74. The floating mass transducer at the round window: direct transmission or bone conduction?
    Arnold A, Kompis M, Candreia C, Pfiffner F, Häusler R, Stieger C.
    Hear Res; 2010 May 21; 263(1-2):120-7. PubMed ID: 20005939
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 75.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 76. Oval and round window vibroplasty: a comparison of hearing results, risks and failures.
    Canale A, Dagna F, Cassandro C, Giordano P, Caranzano F, Lacilla M, Albera R.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Oct 21; 271(10):2637-40. PubMed ID: 24114064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 77. [Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Safety in a Multi-center Clinical Trial of VIBRANT SOUNDBRIDGE in Japan].
    Doi K, Kanzaki S, Kumakawa K, Usami S, Iwasaki S, Yamanaka N, Naito Y, Gyo K, Tono T, Takahashi H, Kanda Y.
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 2015 Dec 21; 118(12):1449-58. PubMed ID: 26964398
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 78. Revision of active middle ear implants (AMEI): causes, surgical issues and rehabilitative transition at a single implanting center.
    Barbara M, Covelli E, Filippi C, Volpini L, Monini S.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Nov 21; 278(11):4289-4294. PubMed ID: 33386437
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 79. Amplification options for patients with mixed hearing loss.
    Zwartenkot JW, Snik AF, Mylanus EA, Mulder JJ.
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Feb 21; 35(2):221-6. PubMed ID: 24448281
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 80. Intraoperative Auditory Brainstem Response Measurements via the Vibrant Soundbridge Active Middle Ear Implant: Comparison of Two Methods.
    Cebulla M, Herrmann DP, Hagen R, Rak K.
    Am J Audiol; 2022 Jun 02; 31(2):261-267. PubMed ID: 35472299
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.