These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

94 related items for PubMed ID: 28220530

  • 1. Re: Klünder et al: High definition urethral pressure profilometry: Evaluating a novel microtip catheter and Klünder et al: Assessing the reproducibility of high definition urethral pressure profilometry and its correlation with an air-charged system.
    Schaefer W.
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2017 Nov; 36(8):2184-2187. PubMed ID: 28220530
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Assessing the reproducibility of high definition urethral pressure profilometry and its correlation with an air-charged system.
    Klünder M, Amend B, Sawodny O, Stenzl A, Ederer M, Kelp A, Sievert KD, Feuer R.
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2017 Jun; 36(5):1292-1300. PubMed ID: 27574912
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. High definition urethral pressure profilometry: Evaluating a novel microtip catheter.
    Klünder M, Amend B, Vaegler M, Kelp A, Feuer R, Sievert KD, Stenzl A, Sawodny O, Ederer M.
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2016 Nov; 35(8):888-894. PubMed ID: 26207994
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Air charged and microtip catheters cannot be used interchangeably for urethral pressure measurement: a prospective, single-blind, randomized trial.
    Zehnder P, Roth B, Burkhard FC, Kessler TM.
    J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):1013-7. PubMed ID: 18639301
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A comparison of urethral profilometry using microtip and fiberoptic catheters.
    Elser DM, London W, Fantl JA, McBride MA, Beck RP.
    Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 1999 Sep; 10(6):371-4. PubMed ID: 10614972
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Signal processing in urodynamics: towards high definition urethral pressure profilometry.
    Klünder M, Sawodny O, Amend B, Ederer M, Kelp A, Sievert KD, Stenzl A, Feuer R.
    Biomed Eng Online; 2016 Mar 22; 15():31. PubMed ID: 27000558
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A comparative study of water perfusion catheters and microtip transducer catheters for urethral pressure measurements.
    Kuhn A, Nager CW, Hawkins E, Schulz J, Stanton SL.
    Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2007 Aug 22; 18(8):931-5. PubMed ID: 17131168
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A randomized comparison of microtip and air-charged catheter for the measurement of maximum urethral closure pressure.
    Mueller MM, Baumann MU, Mueller MD, Kuhn A.
    Ginekol Pol; 2012 Aug 22; 83(8):586-9. PubMed ID: 23342881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Valsalva leak point pressures in women with genuine stress incontinence: reproducibility, effect of catheter caliber, and correlations with other measures of urethral resistance. Continence Program for Women Research Group.
    Bump RC, Elser DM, Theofrastous JP, McClish DK.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Aug 22; 173(2):551-7. PubMed ID: 7645634
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Reproducibility evaluation of air-charged catheter for rest urethral pressure profilometry].
    Chang R, Wang F, Zhang JZ, Wu LY, Zhang CH, Zhou F, Guo W, Zhang P.
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2023 Feb 14; 103(6):449-451. PubMed ID: 36775270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Air-charged and microtransducer urodynamic catheters in the evaluation of urethral function.
    Pollak JT, Neimark M, Connor JT, Davila GW.
    Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2004 Feb 14; 15(2):124-8; discussion 128. PubMed ID: 15014940
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Urethral pressure profilometry with membrane catheter compared with perfusion catheter systems.
    Schmidt RA, Witherow R, van Gool JD, Tanagho EA.
    Urol Int; 1978 Feb 14; 33(5):345-54. PubMed ID: 705985
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Eliminating pulse-induced artifacts in Urethral Pressure data.
    Klunder M, Feuer R, Amend B, Kelp A, Stenzl A, Sievert KD, Sawodny O, Ederer M.
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015 Aug 14; 2015():2779-83. PubMed ID: 26736868
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Possibilities of experimental verification of the validity of urethral pressure profilometry.
    Zatura F, Rosenberg J.
    Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2006 Nov 14; 150(2):345-51. PubMed ID: 17426804
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Vesical instability: urodynamic parameters by microtip transducer catheters.
    Hebert DB, Ostergard DR.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Sep 14; 60(3):331-7. PubMed ID: 6889712
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Relative urethral leakage pressure versus maximum urethral closure pressure. The reliability of the measurement of urethral competence with the new tube-foil sleeve catheter in patients.
    van Venrooij GE, Blok C, van Riel MP, Coolsaet BL.
    J Urol; 1985 Sep 14; 134(3):592-5. PubMed ID: 4040981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Optimum anesthesia for reliable urethral pressure profilometry in female dogs and goats.
    Dybowski B, Burdzińska A, Siewruk K, Dąbrowski M, Pączek L, Radziszewski P.
    Int J Urol; 2016 Aug 14; 23(8):701-5. PubMed ID: 27225822
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Short-term test-retest reproducibility of urethral pressure profilometry in women with urodynamic stress incontinence with and without detrusor overactivity.
    Rahmanou P, Khullar V.
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2011 Sep 14; 30(7):1356-60. PubMed ID: 21538497
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of preoperative and postoperative pressure transmission ratio and urethral pressure profilometry in patients with successful outcome following the vaginal wall patch sling technique.
    Mikhail MS, Rosa H, Palan P, Anderson P.
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2005 Sep 14; 24(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 15389970
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Urethral pressure reflectometry; a novel technique for simultaneous recording of pressure and cross-sectional area: a study of feasibility in the prostatic urethra.
    Aagaard M, Klarskov N, Sønksen J, Bagi P, Colstrup H, Lose G.
    BJU Int; 2012 Oct 14; 110(8):1178-83. PubMed ID: 22416900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.