These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

171 related items for PubMed ID: 28224175

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Transversal changes, space closure, and efficiency of conventional and self-ligating appliances : A quantitative systematic review.
    Yang X, Xue C, He Y, Zhao M, Luo M, Wang P, Bai D.
    J Orofac Orthop; 2018 Jan; 79(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 29101414
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Is there any difference between conventional, passive and active self-ligating brackets? A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Maizeray R, Wagner D, Lefebvre F, Lévy-Bénichou H, Bolender Y.
    Int Orthod; 2021 Dec; 19(4):523-538. PubMed ID: 34629309
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effects of self-ligating brackets on oral hygiene and discomfort: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials.
    Yang X, Su N, Shi Z, Xiang Z, He Y, Han X, Bai D.
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2017 Feb; 15(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 27095145
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of anchorage loss between conventional and self-ligating brackets during canine retraction - A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Malik DES, Fida M, Afzal E, Irfan S.
    Int Orthod; 2020 Mar; 18(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 31866192
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effect of self-ligating bracket type and vibration on frictional force and stick-slip phenomenon in diverse tooth displacement conditions: an in vitro mechanical analysis.
    Seo YJ, Lim BS, Park YG, Yang IH, Ahn SJ, Kim TW, Baek SH.
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Oct; 37(5):474-80. PubMed ID: 25452628
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Systematic review on self-ligating vs. conventional brackets: initial pain, number of visits, treatment time.
    Čelar A, Schedlberger M, Dörfler P, Bertl M.
    J Orofac Orthop; 2013 Jan; 74(1):40-51. PubMed ID: 23299650
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparative assessment of conventional and self-ligating appliances on the effect of mandibular intermolar distance in adolescent nonextraction patients: a single-center randomized controlled trial.
    Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Katsaros C, Eliades T.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):e99-e105. PubMed ID: 21889063
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. An in vitro study into the efficacy of complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets.
    Montasser MA, Keilig L, Bourauel C.
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 Feb; 18(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 25264808
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The effect of bracket ligation on the periodontal status of adolescents undergoing orthodontic treatment. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Arnold S, Koletsi D, Patcas R, Eliades T.
    J Dent; 2016 Nov; 54():13-24. PubMed ID: 27546466
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Different bracket-archwire combinations for simulated correction of two-dimensional tooth malalignment: Leveling outcomes and initial force systems.
    Holtmann S, Konermann A, Keilig L, Reimann S, Jäger A, Montasser M, El-Bialy T, Bourauel C.
    J Orofac Orthop; 2014 Nov; 75(6):459-70. PubMed ID: 25344125
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of mandibular arch changes during alignment and leveling with 2 preadjusted edgewise appliances.
    Fleming PS, DiBiase AT, Sarri G, Lee RT.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):340-7. PubMed ID: 19732667
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Curing lights for orthodontic bonding: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Fleming PS, Eliades T, Katsaros C, Pandis N.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Apr; 143(4 Suppl):S92-103. PubMed ID: 23540642
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Therapeutic efficacy of self-ligating brackets: A systematic review.
    Dehbi H, Azaroual MF, Zaoui F, Halimi A, Benyahia H.
    Int Orthod; 2017 Sep; 15(3):297-311. PubMed ID: 28778722
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of maxillary arch dimensional changes with passive and active self-ligation and conventional brackets in the permanent dentition: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial.
    Fleming PS, Lee RT, Marinho V, Johal A.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 23910199
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Alignment efficiency of Damon3 self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems: a randomized clinical trial.
    Scott P, DiBiase AT, Sherriff M, Cobourne MT.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Oct; 134(4):470.e1-8. PubMed ID: 18929262
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. No reliable evidence to guide initial arch wire choice for fixed appliance therapy.
    Flores-Mir C.
    Evid Based Dent; 2013 Dec; 14(4):114-5. PubMed ID: 24357824
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Friction behavior of self-ligating and conventional brackets with different ligature systems.
    Szczupakowski A, Reimann S, Dirk C, Keilig L, Weber A, Jäger A, Bourauel C.
    J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jul; 77(4):287-95. PubMed ID: 27220902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.