These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
441 related items for PubMed ID: 28247093
21. Changes in the temporomandibular joint after mandibular setback surgery in monkeys: intraoral vertical versus sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Zhao Q, Hu J, Wang D, Zhu S. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Sep; 104(3):329-37. PubMed ID: 17428700 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Three-dimensional analysis of postoperative returning movement of perioperative condylar displacement after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular setback with different fixation methods. Han JJ, Hwang SJ. J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Nov; 43(9):1918-25. PubMed ID: 26346765 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Improvement of the temporomandibular joint symptoms due to the condylar position change following modified L-shaped intraoral vertico-sagittal ramus osteotomy: a single-center, retrospective study. Kikuta S, Matsuo K, Abe Y, Iwanaga J, Kusukawa J. Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 Sep; 28(3):1365-1374. PubMed ID: 38880838 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Changes in condylar and joint disc positions after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism. Fang B, Shen GF, Yang C, Wu Y, Feng YM, Mao LX, Xia YH. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 38(7):726-30. PubMed ID: 19375280 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Assessment of ramus, condyle, masseter muscle, and occlusal force before and after sagittal split ramus osteotomy in patients with mandibular prognathism. Ueki K, Okabe K, Mukozawa A, Miyazaki M, Marukawa K, Hashiba Y, Nakagawa K, Yamamoto E. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Nov; 108(5):679-86. PubMed ID: 19699116 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Effects of sagittal split Ramus osteotomy on condylar position and Ramal orientation in patients with mandibular asymmetry. Meral SE, Koç O, Tosun E, Tüz HH. Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Dec 30; 28(1):65. PubMed ID: 38158456 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Physiological positioning strategy alters condylar position after mandibular ramus sagittal split osteotomies for mandibular prognathism. Ohba S, Ozaki H, Miura KI, Koga T, Kawasaki T, Yoshida N, Asahina I. Cranio; 2018 May 30; 36(3):181-188. PubMed ID: 28391764 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Time-course change in temporomandibular joint space after advancement and setback mandibular osteotomy with Le Fort I osteotomy. Ueki K, Moroi A, Tsutsui T, Hiraide R, Takayama A, Saito Y, Sato M, Baba N, Tsunoda T, Hotta A, Yoshizawa K. J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Apr 30; 46(4):679-687. PubMed ID: 29545032 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Changes in the position of the condyle after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy in patients with mandibular retrusion and protrusion: a new condyle: fossa matching concept. Yin Q, Bi R, Abotaleb B, Jiang N, Li Y, Zhu S. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Dec 30; 57(10):1086-1091. PubMed ID: 31623933 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Short- and long-term changes of condylar position after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular advancement in combination with Le Fort I osteotomy evaluated by cone-beam computed tomography. Chen S, Lei J, Wang X, Fu KY, Farzad P, Yi B. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov 30; 71(11):1956-66. PubMed ID: 23973047 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of temporomandibular joint and ramus morphology between class II and class III cases before and after bi-maxillary osteotomy. Iguchi R, Yoshizawa K, Moroi A, Tsutsui T, Hotta A, Hiraide R, Takayama A, Tsunoda T, Saito Y, Sato M, Baba N, Ueki K. J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Dec 30; 45(12):2002-2009. PubMed ID: 29046240 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The assessment of the short- and long-term changes in the condylar position following sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) with rigid fixation. Kim YI, Jung YH, Cho BH, Kim JR, Kim SS, Son WS, Park SB. J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Apr 30; 37(4):262-70. PubMed ID: 20113391 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Do patients treated with bimaxillary surgery have more stable condylar positions than those who have undergone single-jaw surgery? Kim YJ, Oh KM, Hong JS, Lee JH, Kim HM, Reyes M, Cevidanes LH, Park YH. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep 30; 70(9):2143-52. PubMed ID: 22115974 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Assessment of temporomandibular joint disc position and skeletal stability after bimaxillary surgery. Ueki K, Moroi A, Takayama A, Yoshizawa K. Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 Mar 30; 28(1):137-148. PubMed ID: 37280442 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of sagittal split ramus osteotomy on stress distribution of temporomandibular joints in patients with mandibular prognathism under symmetric occlusions. Ma H, Shu J, Wang Q, Teng H, Liu Z. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2020 Dec 30; 23(16):1297-1305. PubMed ID: 32696672 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Transitional joint effusion in the mandibular prognathic surgery patient: intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy versus sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Nishimura M, Segami N, Sato J, Honjou M, Fujimura K. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 May 30; 62(5):545-8. PubMed ID: 15122556 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of postoperative condylar changes after unilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy and bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy using 3-dimensional analysis. Kang HS, Han JJ, Jung S, Kook MS, Park HJ, Oh HK. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2020 Nov 30; 130(5):505-514. PubMed ID: 32675028 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of the computed tomography values of the bone fragment gap after sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular prognathism with and without asymmetry. Moroi A, Yoshizawa K, Iguchi R, Kosaka A, Ikawa H, Saida Y, Hotta A, Tsutsui T, Ueki K. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Dec 30; 45(12):1520-1525. PubMed ID: 27634690 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of Orthodontics-First and Surgery-First Approach in Positional Changes of the Condyle After Mandibular Setback Surgery Using Three-Dimensional Analysis. Wang T, Han JJ, Oh HK, Park HJ, Jung S, Kook MS. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Dec 30; 74(12):2487-2496. PubMed ID: 27549608 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Change in mandibular body height at the site of a fixation plate in the advance (lengthening) and setback (shortening) sides after sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Ueki K, Yoshizawa K, Moroi A, Iguchi R, Kosaka A, Ikawa H, Tsutsui T, Saida Y, Hotta A. J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Mar 30; 44(3):279-84. PubMed ID: 26787384 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]