These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

504 related items for PubMed ID: 28288777

  • 21. Prospective evaluation of retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children in the first 2 years of life: Is age a risk factor for conversion?
    Badawy H, Saad A, Fahmy A, Dawood W, Aboulfotouh A, Kamal A, Refaei K, Zoaier A, Youssef M.
    J Pediatr Urol; 2017 Oct; 13(5):511.e1-511.e4. PubMed ID: 28483468
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty for patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction: effect on operative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and success rate.
    Braga LH, Pace K, DeMaria J, Lorenzo AJ.
    Eur Urol; 2009 Nov; 56(5):848-57. PubMed ID: 19359084
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Minimally invasive surgical management of pelvic-ureteric junction obstruction: update on the current status of robotic-assisted pyeloplasty.
    Uberoi J, Disick GI, Munver R.
    BJU Int; 2009 Dec; 104(11):1722-9. PubMed ID: 19519760
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. A comparative study of pediatric open pyeloplasty, laparoscopy-assisted extracorporeal pyeloplasty, and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
    Song SH, Lee C, Jung J, Kim SJ, Park S, Park H, Kim KS.
    PLoS One; 2017 Dec; 12(4):e0175026. PubMed ID: 28426695
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Reoperative laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: comparison with open surgery.
    Piaggio LA, Noh PH, González R.
    J Urol; 2007 May; 177(5):1878-82. PubMed ID: 17437840
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Early experience of robotic-assisted reconstructive operations in pediatric urology.
    Chan KW, Lee KH, Tam YH, Sihoe JD.
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2010 May; 20(4):379-82. PubMed ID: 20210665
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. A comparison of open vs laparoscopic pediatric pyeloplasty using the pediatric health information system database--do benefits of laparoscopic approach recede at younger ages?
    Tanaka ST, Grantham JA, Thomas JC, Adams MC, Brock JW, Pope JC.
    J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1479-85. PubMed ID: 18710777
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Perioperative comparison of robotic assisted laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) pyeloplasty versus conventional LESS pyeloplasty.
    Olweny EO, Park SK, Tan YK, Gurbuz C, Cadeddu JA, Best SL.
    Eur Urol; 2012 Feb; 61(2):410-4. PubMed ID: 22036645
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in infants.
    Chandrasekharam VVS, Babu R.
    J Pediatr Urol; 2021 Aug; 17(4):502-510. PubMed ID: 33812779
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Validated cost comparison of open vs. robotic pyeloplasty in American children's hospitals.
    Bennett WE, Whittam BM, Szymanski KM, Rink RC, Cain MP, Carroll AE.
    J Robot Surg; 2017 Jun; 11(2):201-206. PubMed ID: 27766551
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 26.