These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

370 related items for PubMed ID: 28301309

  • 1. Value of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced and Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging in the Detection of Pathologic Complete Response in Cervical Cancer after Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Retrospective Observational Study.
    Jalaguier-Coudray A, Villard-Mahjoub R, Delouche A, Delarbre B, Lambaudie E, Houvenaeghel G, Minsat M, Tallet A, Sabatier R, Thomassin-Naggara I.
    Radiology; 2017 Aug; 284(2):432-442. PubMed ID: 28301309
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Multiparametric prostate MR imaging with T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and dynamic contrast-enhanced sequences: are all pulse sequences necessary to detect locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiation therapy?
    Donati OF, Jung SI, Vargas HA, Gultekin DH, Zheng J, Moskowitz CS, Hricak H, Zelefsky MJ, Akin O.
    Radiology; 2013 Aug; 268(2):440-50. PubMed ID: 23481164
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Locally advanced rectal cancer: added value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the evaluation of tumor response to neoadjuvant chemo- and radiation therapy.
    Kim SH, Lee JM, Hong SH, Kim GH, Lee JY, Han JK, Choi BI.
    Radiology; 2009 Oct; 253(1):116-25. PubMed ID: 19789256
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Rectal cancer: assessment of complete response to preoperative combined radiation therapy with chemotherapy--conventional MR volumetry versus diffusion-weighted MR imaging.
    Curvo-Semedo L, Lambregts DM, Maas M, Thywissen T, Mehsen RT, Lammering G, Beets GL, Caseiro-Alves F, Beets-Tan RG.
    Radiology; 2011 Sep; 260(3):734-43. PubMed ID: 21673229
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Which combination of MR imaging modalities is best for predicting recurrent glioblastoma? Study of diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility.
    Kim HS, Goh MJ, Kim N, Choi CG, Kim SJ, Kim JH.
    Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):831-43. PubMed ID: 24885857
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Diffusion-weighted imaging improves the diagnostic accuracy of conventional 3.0-T breast MR imaging.
    Ei Khouli RH, Jacobs MA, Mezban SD, Huang P, Kamel IR, Macura KJ, Bluemke DA.
    Radiology; 2010 Jul; 256(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 20574085
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. High sensitivity of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for the detection of liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumors: comparison with T2-weighted and dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging.
    d'Assignies G, Fina P, Bruno O, Vullierme MP, Tubach F, Paradis V, Sauvanet A, Ruszniewski P, Vilgrain V.
    Radiology; 2013 Aug; 268(2):390-9. PubMed ID: 23533288
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. In vivo assessment of ductal carcinoma in situ grade: a model incorporating dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted breast MR imaging parameters.
    Rahbar H, Partridge SC, Demartini WB, Gutierrez RL, Allison KH, Peacock S, Lehman CD.
    Radiology; 2012 May; 263(2):374-82. PubMed ID: 22517955
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Uninterpretable Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MR Images in Patients with Post-Treatment Glioblastomas: Cross-Validation of Alternative Imaging Options.
    Heo YJ, Kim HS, Park JE, Choi CG, Kim SJ.
    PLoS One; 2015 May; 10(8):e0136380. PubMed ID: 26296086
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Treatment response evaluation using the mean apparent diffusion coefficient in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy.
    Onal C, Erbay G, Guler OC.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Oct; 44(4):1010-9. PubMed ID: 26919800
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Characterization of complex adnexal masses: value of adding perfusion- and diffusion-weighted MR imaging to conventional MR imaging.
    Thomassin-Naggara I, Toussaint I, Perrot N, Rouzier R, Cuenod CA, Bazot M, Daraï E.
    Radiology; 2011 Mar; 258(3):793-803. PubMed ID: 21193596
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. T1 hyperintense renal lesions: characterization with diffusion-weighted MR imaging versus contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
    Kim S, Jain M, Harris AB, Lee VS, Babb JS, Sigmund EE, Rueff LE, Taouli B.
    Radiology; 2009 Jun; 251(3):796-807. PubMed ID: 19380690
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging: pretreatment prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.
    Park SH, Moon WK, Cho N, Song IC, Chang JM, Park IA, Han W, Noh DY.
    Radiology; 2010 Oct; 257(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 20851939
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Differentiation of malignant from benign pheochromocytomas with diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance at 3.0 T.
    Dong Y, Liu Q.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012 Oct; 36(4):361-6. PubMed ID: 22805661
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.