These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
316 related items for PubMed ID: 28320627
1. Maximal Ambient Noise Levels and Type of Voice Material Required for Valid Use of Smartphones in Clinical Voice Research. Lebacq J, Schoentgen J, Cantarella G, Bruss FT, Manfredi C, DeJonckere P. J Voice; 2017 Sep; 31(5):550-556. PubMed ID: 28320627 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Combined Use of Standard and Throat Microphones for Measurement of Acoustic Voice Parameters and Voice Categorization. Uloza V, Padervinskis E, Uloziene I, Saferis V, Verikas A. J Voice; 2015 Sep; 29(5):552-9. PubMed ID: 25795349 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Captured With a Smartphone - Measurements With Added Ambient Noise. Uloza V, Ulozaitė-Stanienė N, Petrauskas T, Kregždytė R. J Voice; 2023 May; 37(3):465.e19-465.e26. PubMed ID: 33676807 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Automatic Voice Pathology Detection With Running Speech by Using Estimation of Auditory Spectrum and Cepstral Coefficients Based on the All-Pole Model. Ali Z, Elamvazuthi I, Alsulaiman M, Muhammad G. J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):757.e7-757.e19. PubMed ID: 26522263 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Natural Voice Use in Patients With Voice Disorders and Vocally Healthy Speakers Based on 2 Days Voice Accumulator Information From a Database. Södersten M, Salomão GL, McAllister A, Ternström S. J Voice; 2015 Sep; 29(5):646.e1-9. PubMed ID: 26073776 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. An Innovative Voice Analyzer "VA" Smart Phone Program for Quantitative Analysis of Voice Quality. Kojima T, Fujimura S, Hori R, Okanoue Y, Shoji K, Inoue M. J Voice; 2019 Sep; 33(5):642-648. PubMed ID: 29801970 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Testing the reliability of Grade, Roughness and Breathiness scores by means of synthetic speech stimuli. Schoentgen J, Fraj S, Lucero JC. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2015 Apr; 40(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 24117123 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Validity of Acoustic Measures Obtained Using Various Recording Methods Including Smartphones With and Without Headset Microphones. Awan SN, Bahr R, Watts S, Boyer M, Budinsky R, Bridge2AI Voice Consortium, Bensoussan Y. J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2024 Jun 06; 67(6):1712-1730. PubMed ID: 38749007 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Investigation of Voice Pathology Detection and Classification on Different Frequency Regions Using Correlation Functions. Al-Nasheri A, Muhammad G, Alsulaiman M, Ali Z. J Voice; 2017 Jan 06; 31(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 26992554 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Effect of Microphone Type on Acoustical Measures of Synthesized Vowels. Kisenwether JS, Sataloff RT. J Voice; 2015 Sep 06; 29(5):548-51. PubMed ID: 25998411 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A Comparison of Cepstral Peak Prominence Measures From Two Acoustic Analysis Programs. Watts CR, Awan SN, Maryn Y. J Voice; 2017 May 06; 31(3):387.e1-387.e10. PubMed ID: 27751661 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Using Rate of Divergence as an Objective Measure to Differentiate between Voice Signal Types Based on the Amount of Disorder in the Signal. Calawerts WM, Lin L, Sprott JC, Jiang JJ. J Voice; 2017 Jan 06; 31(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 26920858 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]