These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

932 related items for PubMed ID: 28327114

  • 1. Study-protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing clinical and radiological results after three different posterior decompression techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis: the Spinal Stenosis Trial (SST) (part of the NORDSTEN Study).
    Hermansen E, Austevoll IM, Romild UK, Rekeland F, Solberg T, Storheim K, Grundnes O, Aaen J, Brox JI, Hellum C, Indrekvam K.
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Mar 21; 18(1):121. PubMed ID: 28327114
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Does surgical technique influence clinical outcome after lumbar spinal stenosis decompression? A comparative effectiveness study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery.
    Hermansen E, Romild UK, Austevoll IM, Solberg T, Storheim K, Brox JI, Hellum C, Indrekvam K.
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb 21; 26(2):420-427. PubMed ID: 27262561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of 3 Different Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Hermansen E, Austevoll IM, Hellum C, Storheim K, Myklebust TÅ, Aaen J, Banitalebi H, Anvar M, Rekeland F, Brox JI, Franssen E, Weber C, Solberg TK, Furunes H, Grundnes O, Brisby H, Indrekvam K.
    JAMA Netw Open; 2022 Mar 01; 5(3):e224291. PubMed ID: 35344046
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effectiveness of posterior decompression techniques compared with conventional laminectomy for lumbar stenosis.
    Overdevest GM, Jacobs W, Vleggeert-Lankamp C, Thomé C, Gunzburg R, Peul W.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Mar 11; (3):CD010036. PubMed ID: 25760812
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparable increases in dural sac area after three different posterior decompression techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis: radiological results from a randomized controlled trial in the NORDSTEN study.
    Hermansen E, Austevoll IM, Hellum C, Storheim K, Myklebust TÅ, Aaen J, Banitalebi H, Anvar M, Rekeland F, Brox JI, Franssen E, Weber C, Solberg T, Haug KJ, Grundnes O, Brisby H, Indrekvam K.
    Eur Spine J; 2020 Sep 11; 29(9):2254-2261. PubMed ID: 32556585
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Decompression alone versus decompression with instrumental fusion the NORDSTEN degenerative spondylolisthesis trial (NORDSTEN-DS); study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Austevoll IM, Hermansen E, Fagerland M, Rekeland F, Solberg T, Storheim K, Brox JI, Lønne G, Indrekvam K, Aaen J, Grundnes O, Hellum C.
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Jan 05; 20(1):7. PubMed ID: 30611229
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Is There an Association Between Radiological Severity of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Disability, Pain, or Surgical Outcome?: A Multicenter Observational Study.
    Weber C, Giannadakis C, Rao V, Jakola AS, Nerland U, Nygaard ØP, Solberg TK, Gulati S, Solheim O.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jan 05; 41(2):E78-83. PubMed ID: 26352747
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Success and failure of minimally invasive decompression for focal lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without deformity.
    Kelleher MO, Timlin M, Persaud O, Rampersaud YR.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep 01; 35(19):E981-7. PubMed ID: 20386501
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Do patients with lumbar spinal stenosis benefit from decompression of levels with adjacent moderate stenosis? A prospective cohort study from the NORDSTEN study.
    Tronstad S, Haug KJ, Myklebust TÅ, Weber C, Brisby H, Austevoll IM, Hellum C, Storheim K, Aaen J, Banitalebi H, Brox JI, Grundnes O, Franssen E, Indrekvam K, Solberg T, Hermansen E.
    Spine J; 2024 Jun 01; 24(6):1015-1021. PubMed ID: 38266826
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy.
    Thomé C, Zevgaridis D, Leheta O, Bäzner H, Pöckler-Schöniger C, Wöhrle J, Schmiedek P.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2005 Aug 01; 3(2):129-41. PubMed ID: 16370302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Modified Marmot operation versus spinous process transverse cutting laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Kawakami M, Nakao S, Fukui D, Kadosaka Y, Matsuoka T, Yamada H.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov 01; 38(23):E1461-8. PubMed ID: 23778375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Is the presence of foraminal stenosis associated with outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis patients treated with posterior microsurgical decompression.
    Aaen J, Banitalebi H, Austevoll IM, Hellum C, Storheim K, Myklebust TÅ, Anvar M, Weber C, Solberg T, Grundnes O, Brisby H, Indrekvam K, Hermansen E.
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2023 Aug 01; 165(8):2121-2129. PubMed ID: 37407851
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. MILD® Is an Effective Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Neurogenic Claudication: MiDAS ENCORE Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Benyamin RM, Staats PS, MiDAS Encore I.
    Pain Physician; 2016 May 01; 19(4):229-42. PubMed ID: 27228511
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effectiveness of posterior decompression techniques compared with conventional laminectomy for lumbar stenosis.
    Overdevest G, Vleggeert-Lankamp C, Jacobs W, Thomé C, Gunzburg R, Peul W.
    Eur Spine J; 2015 Oct 01; 24(10):2244-63. PubMed ID: 26184719
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article.
    Mobbs RJ, Li J, Sivabalan P, Raley D, Rao PJ.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug 01; 21(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 24878273
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Degenerative spondylolisthesis does not affect the outcome of unilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression in patients with lumbar stenosis.
    Chang HS, Fujisawa N, Tsuchiya T, Oya S, Matsui T.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar 01; 39(5):400-8. PubMed ID: 24365897
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The Sagittal Balance Does not Influence the 1 Year Clinical Outcome of Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Without Obvious Instability After Microsurgical Decompression.
    Bayerl SH, Pöhlmann F, Finger T, Onken J, Franke J, Czabanka M, Woitzik J, Vajkoczy P.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jul 01; 40(13):1014-21. PubMed ID: 25893354
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Irrigation endoscopic decompressive laminotomy. A new endoscopic approach for spinal stenosis decompression.
    Soliman HM.
    Spine J; 2015 Oct 01; 15(10):2282-9. PubMed ID: 26165475
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Five-year results of a clinical pilot study utilizing a pedicle-lengthening osteotomy for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Mlyavykh S, Ludwig SC, Kepler CK, Anderson DG.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Sep 01; 29(3):241-249. PubMed ID: 29856305
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Decompression alone or with fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (Nordsten-DS): five year follow-up of a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial.
    Kgomotso EL, Hellum C, Fagerland MW, Solberg T, Brox JI, Storheim K, Hermansen E, Franssen E, Weber C, Brisby H, Algaard KRH, Furunes H, Banitalebi H, Ljøstad I, Indrekvam K, Austevoll IM, Nordsten collaborators.
    BMJ; 2024 Aug 07; 386():e079771. PubMed ID: 39111800
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 47.