These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

173 related items for PubMed ID: 28346006

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Biomechanical comparison between bicortical pin and monocortical screw/polymethylmethacrylate constructs in the cadaveric canine cervical vertebral column.
    Hettlich BF, Allen MJ, Pascetta D, Fosgate GT, Litsky AS.
    Vet Surg; 2013 Aug; 42(6):693-700. PubMed ID: 23888877
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Biomechanical Comparison of 2 Veterinary Locking Plates to Monocortical Screw/Polymethylmethacrylate Fixation in Canine Cadaveric Cervical Vertebral Column.
    Hettlich BF, Fosgate GT, Litsky AS.
    Vet Surg; 2017 Jan; 46(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 27902850
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Evaluation of MR issues for the latest standard brands of orthopedic metal implants: plates and screws.
    Zou YF, Chu B, Wang CB, Hu ZY.
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Mar; 84(3):450-457. PubMed ID: 25544555
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effect of an intervertebral disk spacer on stiffness after monocortical screw/polymethylmethacrylate fixation in simulated and cadaveric canine cervical vertebral columns.
    Hettlich BF, Allen MJ, Glucksman GS, Fosgate GT, Litsky AS.
    Vet Surg; 2014 Nov; 43(8):988-94. PubMed ID: 24512474
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Titanium wire internal fixation for stabilization of injury of the cervical spine: clinical results and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging of the spinal cord.
    Geisler FH, Mirvis SE, Zrebeet H, Joslyn JN.
    Neurosurgery; 1989 Sep; 25(3):356-62. PubMed ID: 2771006
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Metallic spinal artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging.
    Vaccaro AR, Chesnut RM, Scuderi G, Healy JF, Massie JB, Garfin SR.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1994 Jun 01; 19(11):1237-42. PubMed ID: 8073315
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of metal artifact reduction techniques in magnetic resonance imaging of carbon-reinforced PEEK and titanium spinal implants.
    Osterhoff G, Huber FA, Graf LC, Erdlen F, Pape HC, Sprengel K, Guggenberger R.
    Acta Radiol; 2022 Aug 01; 63(8):1062-1070. PubMed ID: 34229463
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Magnetic resonance imaging of titanium anterior cervical spine plating systems.
    Tominaga T, Shimizu H, Koshu K, Kayama T, Yoshimoto T.
    Neurosurgery; 1995 May 01; 36(5):951-5. PubMed ID: 7791987
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Anterior and posterior cervical spine fixation using titanium implants to facilitate magnetic resonance imaging evaluation.
    Savolaine ER, Ebraheim NA, Andreshak TG, Jackson WT.
    J Orthop Trauma; 1989 May 01; 3(4):295-9. PubMed ID: 2600696
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. In vitro biomechanical evaluations of screw-bar-polymethylmethacrylate and pin-polymethylmethacrylate internal fixation implants used to stabilize the vertebral motion unit of the fourth and fifth cervical vertebrae in vertebral column specimens from dogs.
    Hicks DG, Pitts MJ, Bagley RS, Vasavada A, Chen AV, Wininger FA, Simon JC.
    Am J Vet Res; 2009 Jun 01; 70(6):719-26. PubMed ID: 19496660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A biomechanical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging-compatible wire in cervical spine fixation.
    Scuderi GJ, Greenberg SS, Cohen DS, Latta LL, Eismont FJ.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1993 Oct 15; 18(14):1991-4. PubMed ID: 8272948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Options for the reduction of magnetic susceptibility artifacts caused by implanted microchips in 0.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging].
    Piesnack S, Oechtering G, Ludewig E.
    Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere; 2015 Oct 15; 43(2):83-92. PubMed ID: 25727725
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Magnetic resonance imaging after pedicular screw fixation of the spine.
    Ebraheim NA, Savolaine ER, Stitgen SH, Jackson WT.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Jun 15; (279):133-7. PubMed ID: 1600647
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The radiographic and imaging characteristics of porous tantalum implants within the human cervical spine.
    Levi AD, Choi WG, Keller PJ, Heiserman JE, Sonntag VK, Dickman CA.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Jun 01; 23(11):1245-50; discussion 1251. PubMed ID: 9636978
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluation of Three Human Cervical Fusion Implants for Use in the Canine Cervical Vertebral Column.
    Morrison EJ, Litsky AS, Allen MJ, Fosgate GT, Hettlich BF.
    Vet Surg; 2016 Oct 01; 45(7):901-908. PubMed ID: 27598029
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Inter- and intraobserver reliability of computed tomography in assessment of thoracic pedicle screw placement.
    Rao G, Brodke DS, Rondina M, Bacchus K, Dailey AT.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Nov 15; 28(22):2527-30. PubMed ID: 14624089
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Magnetic resonance imaging artifact following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a trabecular metal cage.
    Elliott CA, Fox R, Ashforth R, Gourishankar S, Nataraj A.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Mar 15; 24(3):496-501. PubMed ID: 26613279
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Imaging diagnosis-magnetic resonance imaging pulsatility artifact in the canine cervical spine.
    Seiler GS, Robertson ID, Mukundan S, Thrall DE.
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2011 Mar 15; 52(3):313-6. PubMed ID: 21554480
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.