These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
94 related items for PubMed ID: 2834793
1. [Studies on image quality in mammography using a tungsten anode tube in conjunction with edge filters]. Minski M, Säbel M, Aichinger H, Joite-Barfuss S. Rofo; 1988 Apr; 148(4):437-43. PubMed ID: 2834793 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Experimental investigations for dose reduction by optimizing the radiation quality for digital mammography with an a-Se detector]. Schulz-Wendtland R, Hermann KP, Wenkel E, Böhner C, Lell M, Dassel MS, Bautz WA. Rofo; 2007 May; 179(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 17436182 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [A bimetal anode with tungsten or rhodium? Comparative studies on image quality and dosage requirement in mammography]. Funke M, Hermann KP, Breiter N, Moritz J, Müller D, Grabbe E. Rofo; 1995 Nov; 163(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 8527751 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimization of tube potential-filter combinations for film-screen mammography: a contrast detail phantom study. Chida K, Zuguchi M, Sai M, Saito H, Yamada T, Ishibashi T, Ito D, Kimoto N, Kohzuki M, Takahashi S. Clin Imaging; 2005 Nov; 29(4):246-50. PubMed ID: 15967314 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Monochromatic x-rays in digital mammography. Lawaczeck R, Arkadiev V, Diekmann F, Krumrey M. Invest Radiol; 2005 Jan; 40(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 15597018 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of anode/filter material and tube potential on contrast, signal-to-noise ratio and average absorbed dose in mammography: a Monte Carlo study. Dance DR, Thilander AK, Sandborg M, Skinner CL, Castellano IA, Carlsson GA. Br J Radiol; 2000 Oct; 73(874):1056-67. PubMed ID: 11271898 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Film-screen mammography x-ray tube anodes: molybdenum versus tungsten. Kimme-Smith C, Bassett LW, Gold RH, Rothschild P. Med Phys; 1989 Aug; 16(2):279-83. PubMed ID: 2716707 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Experimental investigation on the choice of the tungsten/rhodium anode/filter combination for an amorphous selenium-based digital mammography system. Toroi P, Zanca F, Young KC, van Ongeval C, Marchal G, Bosmans H. Eur Radiol; 2007 Sep; 17(9):2368-75. PubMed ID: 17268798 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Contrast-to-noise ratio in magnification mammography: a Monte Carlo study. Koutalonis M, Delis H, Spyrou G, Costaridou L, Tzanakos G, Panayiotakis G. Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun 07; 52(11):3185-99. PubMed ID: 17505097 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Image quality in film and xero mammography. Second paper. Reproduction of medium range contrast (author's transl)]. Willgeroth F, Paterok EM, Säbel M, Weishaar J. Rofo; 1980 Apr 07; 132(4):433-7. PubMed ID: 6450105 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]