These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

711 related items for PubMed ID: 28363891

  • 1. Cement-in-cement revision of the femoral stem: analysis of 1179 first-time revisions in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.
    Cnudde PH, Kärrholm J, Rolfson O, Timperley AJ, Mohaddes M.
    Bone Joint J; 2017 Apr; 99-B(4 Supple B):27-32. PubMed ID: 28363891
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Primary aseptic revision of the femoral component of a cemented total hip arthroplasty using a cemented technique without bone graft.
    Bardou-Jacquet J, Souillac V, Mouton A, Chauveaux D.
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Jun; 95(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 19523892
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Cement-in-cement femoral component revision in the multiply revised total hip arthroplasty: results with a minimum follow-up of five years.
    Sandiford NA, Jameson SS, Wilson MJ, Hubble MJ, Timperley AJ, Howell JR.
    Bone Joint J; 2017 Feb; 99-B(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 28148661
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The Exeter V40 cemented femoral component at a minimum 10-year follow-up: the first 540 cases.
    Westerman RW, Whitehouse SL, Hubble MJW, Timperley AJ, Howell JR, Wilson MJ.
    Bone Joint J; 2018 Aug; 100-B(8):1002-1009. PubMed ID: 30062940
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Revision of the cemented femoral stem using a cement-in-cement technique: a five- to 15-year review.
    Duncan WW, Hubble MJ, Howell JR, Whitehouse SL, Timperley AJ, Gie GA.
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 May; 91(5):577-82. PubMed ID: 19407288
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Cement-in-cement femoral component revision : a comparison of two different taper-slip designs with medium-term follow up.
    Kennedy JW, Ng NYB, Young D, Kane N, Marsh AG, Meek RMD.
    Bone Joint J; 2021 Jul; 103-B(7):1215-1221. PubMed ID: 34192939
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Satisfactory Results of the Exeter Revision Femoral Stem Used for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Desy NM, Johnson JD, Sierra RJ.
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Feb; 32(2):494-498. PubMed ID: 27600303
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Not all cementless femoral stems are created equal but the results may be comparable.
    Carlson SW, Liu SS, Callaghan JJ.
    Bone Joint J; 2017 Jan; 99-B(1 Supple A):14-17. PubMed ID: 28042113
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Do Rerevision Rates Differ After First-time Revision of Primary THA With a Cemented and Cementless Femoral Component?
    Gromov K, Pedersen AB, Overgaard S, Gebuhr P, Malchau H, Troelsen A.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3391-8. PubMed ID: 25762017
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 36.