These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

410 related items for PubMed ID: 28372135

  • 1. Spatial release from masking based on binaural processing for up to six maskers.
    Yost WA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):2093. PubMed ID: 28372135
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effect of priming on energetic and informational masking in a same-different task.
    Jones JA, Freyman RL.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Mar; 33(1):124-33. PubMed ID: 21841488
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Combining energetic and informational masking for speech identification.
    Kidd G, Mason CR, Gallun FJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):982-92. PubMed ID: 16158654
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Speech intelligibility among modulated and spatially distributed noise sources.
    Culling JF, Mansell ER.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2254-61. PubMed ID: 23556593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The multiple contributions of interaural differences to improved speech intelligibility in multitalker scenarios.
    Schoenmaker E, Brand T, van de Par S.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2589. PubMed ID: 27250153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Spatial release from masking in reverberation for school-age children.
    Peng ZE, Pausch F, Fels J.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Nov; 150(5):3263. PubMed ID: 34852617
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. On the near non-existence of "pure" energetic masking release for speech.
    Stone MA, Moore BC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Apr; 135(4):1967-77. PubMed ID: 25234995
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The effect of room acoustical parameters on speech reception thresholds and spatial release from masking.
    Biberger T, Ewert SD.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Oct; 146(4):2188. PubMed ID: 31671969
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Benefits of Acoustic Beamforming for Solving the Cocktail Party Problem.
    Kidd G, Mason CR, Best V, Swaminathan J.
    Trends Hear; 2015 Jun 30; 19():. PubMed ID: 26126896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of fluctuating maskers for speech recognition tests.
    Francart T, van Wieringen A, Wouters J.
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan 30; 50(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 21091261
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The effects of spatial separation in distance on the informational and energetic masking of a nearby speech signal.
    Brungart DS, Simpson BD.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Aug 30; 112(2):664-76. PubMed ID: 12186046
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A cocktail party model of spatial release from masking by both noise and speech interferers.
    Jones GL, Litovsky RY.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep 30; 130(3):1463-74. PubMed ID: 21895087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Informational masking and the effects of differences in fundamental frequency and fundamental-frequency contour on phonetic integration in a formant ensemble.
    Summers RJ, Bailey PJ, Roberts B.
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb 30; 344():295-303. PubMed ID: 27815130
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Psychometric functions for sentence recognition in sinusoidally amplitude-modulated noises.
    Shen Y, Manzano NK, Richards VM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec 30; 138(6):3613-24. PubMed ID: 26723318
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA, Grant KW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug 30; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The effect of nearby maskers on speech intelligibility in reverberant, multi-talker environments.
    Westermann A, Buchholz JM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar 30; 141(3):2214. PubMed ID: 28372143
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Spatial Release From Masking in Children: Effects of Simulated Unilateral Hearing Loss.
    Corbin NE, Buss E, Leibold LJ.
    Ear Hear; 2017 Mar 30; 38(2):223-235. PubMed ID: 27787392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Microscopic prediction of speech intelligibility in spatially distributed speech-shaped noise for normal-hearing listeners.
    Geravanchizadeh M, Fallah A.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec 30; 138(6):4004-15. PubMed ID: 26723354
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Voice segregation by difference in fundamental frequency: effect of masker type.
    Deroche ML, Culling JF.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov 30; 134(5):EL465-70. PubMed ID: 24181992
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Speech detection in spatial and nonspatial speech maskers.
    Balakrishnan U, Freyman RL.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 May 30; 123(5):2680-91. PubMed ID: 18529187
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.