These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
486 related items for PubMed ID: 28372939
1. C-Tactile Mediated Erotic Touch Perception Relates to Sexual Desire and Performance in a Gender-Specific Way. Bendas J, Georgiadis JR, Ritschel G, Olausson H, Weidner K, Croy I. J Sex Med; 2017 May; 14(5):645-653. PubMed ID: 28372939 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Touch satiety: differential effects of stroking velocity on liking and wanting touch over repetitions. Triscoli C, Ackerley R, Sailer U. PLoS One; 2014 May; 9(11):e113425. PubMed ID: 25405620 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Dissociable sources of erogeneity in social touch: Imagining and perceiving C-Tactile optimal touch in erogenous zones. Panagiotopoulou E, Filippetti ML, Gentsch A, Fotopoulou A. PLoS One; 2018 May; 13(8):e0203039. PubMed ID: 30142185 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Stroking and tapping the skin: behavioral and electrodermal effects. Etzi R, Carta C, Gallace A. Exp Brain Res; 2018 Feb; 236(2):453-461. PubMed ID: 29214391 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Visual perception of the arm manipulates the experienced pleasantness of touch. Keizer A, de Jong JR, Bartlema L, Dijkerman C. Dev Cogn Neurosci; 2019 Feb; 35():104-108. PubMed ID: 28958660 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Aβ-CT Affective Touch: Touch Pleasantness Ratings for Gentle Stroking and Deep Pressure Exhibit Dependence on A-Fibers. Case LK, Madian N, McCall MV, Bradson ML, Liljencrantz J, Goldstein B, Alasha VJ, Zimmerman MS. eNeuro; 2023 May; 10(5):. PubMed ID: 37169581 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Vicarious ratings of social touch reflect the anatomical distribution & velocity tuning of C-tactile afferents: A hedonic homunculus? Walker SC, Trotter PD, Woods A, McGlone F. Behav Brain Res; 2017 Mar 01; 320():91-96. PubMed ID: 27915070 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Touch-induced pupil size reflects stimulus intensity, not subjective pleasantness. van Hooijdonk R, Mathot S, Schat E, Spencer H, van der Stigchel S, Dijkerman HC. Exp Brain Res; 2019 Jan 01; 237(1):201-210. PubMed ID: 30374784 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The individual preferred velocity of stroking touch as a stable measurement. Luong A, Bendas J, Etzi R, Olausson H, Croy I. Physiol Behav; 2017 Aug 01; 177():129-134. PubMed ID: 28442332 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Disturbances in affective touch in hereditary sensory & autonomic neuropathy type III. Macefield VG, Norcliffe-Kaufmann L, Löken L, Axelrod FB, Kaufmann H. Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Jul 01; 93(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 24726998 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimal delineation of single C-tactile and C-nociceptive afferents in humans by latency slowing. Watkins RH, Wessberg J, Backlund Wasling H, Dunham JP, Olausson H, Johnson RD, Ackerley R. J Neurophysiol; 2017 Apr 01; 117(4):1608-1614. PubMed ID: 28123010 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Pleasantness of touch in human glabrous and hairy skin: order effects on affective ratings. Löken LS, Evert M, Wessberg J. Brain Res; 2011 Oct 12; 1417():9-15. PubMed ID: 21907328 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]