These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
176 related items for PubMed ID: 28376646
1. Why the Diabetes Technology Society Surveillance Protocol for Glucose Meters Needs to Be Revised. Krouwer JS. J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 11(6):1247-1249. PubMed ID: 28376646 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Introduction of a Novel Smartphone-Coupled Blood Glucose Monitoring System. Jendrike N, Baumstark A, Chen CH, Rittmeyer D, Haug C, Freckmann G. J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 11(6):1231-1233. PubMed ID: 28459160 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The chronic injury glucose error grid: a tool to reduce diabetes complications. Krouwer JS, Cembrowski GS. J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Jan; 9(1):149-52. PubMed ID: 25316713 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Do the New FDA Guidance Documents Help Improving Performance of Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Compared With ISO 15197? Freckmann G, Baumstark A, Pleus S. J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 11(6):1240-1246. PubMed ID: 28587476 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Seven-Year Surveillance of the Clinical Performance of a Blood Glucose Test Strip Product. Setford S, Grady M, Phillips S, Miller L, Mackintosh S, Cameron H, Corrigall K. J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 11(6):1155-1162. PubMed ID: 28406040 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of System Accuracy, Intermediate Measurement Precision, and Measurement Repeatability of a Blood Glucose Monitoring System Based on ISO 15197. Jendrike N, Baumstark A, Pleus S, Mende J, Haug C, Freckmann G. J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2019 Mar; 13(2):235-241. PubMed ID: 30547683 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance Evaluation of Three Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Using ISO 15197: 2013 Accuracy Criteria, Consensus and Surveillance Error Grid Analyses, and Insulin Dosing Error Modeling in a Hospital Setting. Bedini JL, Wallace JF, Pardo S, Petruschke T. J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Oct 07; 10(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 26445813 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A review of standards and statistics used to describe blood glucose monitor performance. Krouwer JS, Cembrowski GS. J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2010 Jan 01; 4(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 20167170 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. FDA approves new Glucose Monitoring System. Klonoff DC. Diabetes Technol Ther; 1999 Jan 01; 1(3):349. PubMed ID: 11475279 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A Real-World Setting Study: Which Glucose Meter Could Be the Best for POCT Use? An Easy and Applicable Protocol During the Hospital Routine. Mancini A, Esposto G, Manfrini S, Rilli S, Tinti G, Carta G, Petrolati L, Vidali M, Barocci S. J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2018 Sep 01; 12(5):1053-1060. PubMed ID: 29783898 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Why the New FDA Glucose Meter POCT Guidance Is Disappointing. Krouwer JS. J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Nov 01; 11(6):1274. PubMed ID: 27923882 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]