These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


1110 related items for PubMed ID: 28423287

  • 1. Microfracture Versus Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation for Articular Cartilage Lesions in the Knee: A Systematic Review of 5-Year Outcomes.
    Kraeutler MJ, Belk JW, Purcell JM, McCarty EC.
    Am J Sports Med; 2018 Mar; 46(4):995-999. PubMed ID: 28423287
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Third-Generation Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation (Cells Cultured Within Collagen Membrane) Is Superior to Microfracture for Focal Chondral Defects of the Knee Joint: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Dhillon J, Decilveo AP, Kraeutler MJ, Belk JW, McCulloch PC, Scillia AJ.
    Arthroscopy; 2022 Aug; 38(8):2579-2586. PubMed ID: 35283221
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Is implantation of autologous chondrocytes superior to microfracture for articular-cartilage defects of the knee? A systematic review of 5-year follow-up data.
    Na Y, Shi Y, Liu W, Jia Y, Kong L, Zhang T, Han C, Ren Y.
    Int J Surg; 2019 Aug; 68():56-62. PubMed ID: 31220632
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Clinical and radiographical ten years long-term outcome of microfracture vs. autologous chondrocyte implantation: a matched-pair analysis.
    Ossendorff R, Franke K, Erdle B, Uhl M, Südkamp NP, Salzmann GM.
    Int Orthop; 2019 Mar; 43(3):553-559. PubMed ID: 29909583
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Autologous chondrocyte implantation in the knee: systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Mistry H, Connock M, Pink J, Shyangdan D, Clar C, Royle P, Court R, Biant LC, Metcalfe A, Waugh N.
    Health Technol Assess; 2017 Feb; 21(6):1-294. PubMed ID: 28244303
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparative Effectiveness of Cartilage Repair With Respect to the Minimal Clinically Important Difference.
    Jones KJ, Kelley BV, Arshi A, McAllister DR, Fabricant PD.
    Am J Sports Med; 2019 Nov; 47(13):3284-3293. PubMed ID: 31082325
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Primary Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation of the Knee Versus Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation After Failed Marrow Stimulation: A Systematic Review.
    Schuette HB, Kraeutler MJ, Schrock JB, McCarty EC.
    Am J Sports Med; 2021 Jul; 49(9):2536-2541. PubMed ID: 33156690
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Autologous chondrocyte implantation using the original periosteum-cover technique versus matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation: a randomized clinical trial.
    Zeifang F, Oberle D, Nierhoff C, Richter W, Moradi B, Schmitt H.
    Am J Sports Med; 2010 May; 38(5):924-33. PubMed ID: 19966102
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Cell-Seeded Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation: A Simplified Implantation Technique That Maintains High Clinical Outcomes.
    Gomoll AH, Ambra LF, Phan A, Mastrocola M, Shah N.
    Am J Sports Med; 2017 Apr; 45(5):1028-1036. PubMed ID: 28056183
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Biological Reconstruction of Localized Full-Thickness Cartilage Defects of the Knee: A Systematic Review of Level 1 Studies with a Minimum Follow-Up of 5 Years.
    Angele P, Zellner J, Schröter S, Flechtenmacher J, Fritz J, Niemeyer P.
    Cartilage; 2022 Dec; 13(4):5-18. PubMed ID: 36250517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The Effect of Cell Dose on the Early Magnetic Resonance Morphological Outcomes of Autologous Cell Implantation for Articular Cartilage Defects in the Knee: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Niemeyer P, Laute V, John T, Becher C, Diehl P, Kolombe T, Fay J, Siebold R, Niks M, Fickert S, Zinser W.
    Am J Sports Med; 2016 Aug; 44(8):2005-14. PubMed ID: 27206690
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Marrow Stimulation Has Relatively Inferior Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cartilage Restoration Surgery of the Knee: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Abraamyan T, Johnson AJ, Wiedrick J, Crawford DC.
    Am J Sports Med; 2022 Mar; 50(3):858-866. PubMed ID: 33890799
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Long-term outcomes after first-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation for cartilage defects of the knee.
    Niemeyer P, Porichis S, Steinwachs M, Erggelet C, Kreuz PC, Schmal H, Uhl M, Ghanem N, Südkamp NP, Salzmann G.
    Am J Sports Med; 2014 Jan; 42(1):150-7. PubMed ID: 24145948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Matrix-induced autologous mesenchymal stem cell implantation versus matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation in the treatment of chondral defects of the knee: a 2-year randomized study.
    Akgun I, Unlu MC, Erdal OA, Ogut T, Erturk M, Ovali E, Kantarci F, Caliskan G, Akgun Y.
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2015 Feb; 135(2):251-263. PubMed ID: 25548122
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Long-term T2 and Qualitative MRI Morphology After First-Generation Knee Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation: Cartilage Ultrastructure Is Not Correlated to Clinical or Qualitative MRI Outcome.
    Salzmann GM, Erdle B, Porichis S, Uhl M, Ghanem N, Schmal H, Kubosch D, Südkamp NP, Niemeyer P.
    Am J Sports Med; 2014 Aug; 42(8):1832-40. PubMed ID: 24936583
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Arthroscopic Matrix-Assisted Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation Versus Microfracture: A 6-Year Follow-up of a Prospective Randomized Trial.
    Ibarra C, Villalobos E, Madrazo-Ibarra A, Velasquillo C, Martinez-Lopez V, Izaguirre A, Olivos-Meza A, Cortes-Gonzalez S, Perez-Jimenez FJ, Vargas-Ramirez A, Franco-Sanchez G, Ibarra-Ibarra LG, Sierra-Suarez L, Almazan A, Ortega-Sanchez C, Trueba C, Martin FB, Arredondo-Valdes R, Chavez-Arias D.
    Am J Sports Med; 2021 Jul; 49(8):2165-2176. PubMed ID: 34048286
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Costal Chondrocyte-Derived Pellet-Type Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Versus Microfracture for the Treatment of Articular Cartilage Defects: A 5-Year Follow-up of a Prospective Randomized Trial.
    Yoon KH, Lee J, Park JY.
    Am J Sports Med; 2024 Feb; 52(2):362-367. PubMed ID: 38230875
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Prospective Long-term Follow-up of Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation With Periosteum Versus Matrix-Associated Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Barié A, Kruck P, Sorbi R, Rehnitz C, Oberle D, Walker T, Zeifang F, Moradi B.
    Am J Sports Med; 2020 Jul; 48(9):2230-2241. PubMed ID: 32667270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Matrix-Applied Characterized Autologous Cultured Chondrocytes Versus Microfracture: Two-Year Follow-up of a Prospective Randomized Trial.
    Saris D, Price A, Widuchowski W, Bertrand-Marchand M, Caron J, Drogset JO, Emans P, Podskubka A, Tsuchida A, Kili S, Levine D, Brittberg M, SUMMIT study group.
    Am J Sports Med; 2014 Jun; 42(6):1384-94. PubMed ID: 24714783
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Sustained superiority in KOOS subscores after matrix-associated chondrocyte implantation using spheroids compared to microfracture.
    Hoburg A, Niemeyer P, Laute V, Zinser W, Becher C, Kolombe T, Fay J, Pietsch S, Kuźma T, Widuchowski W, Fickert S.
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2023 Jun; 31(6):2482-2493. PubMed ID: 36269383
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 56.