These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
734 related items for PubMed ID: 28426437
1. Supersonic transient magnetic resonance elastography for quantitative assessment of tissue elasticity. Liu Y, Liu J, Fite BZ, Foiret J, Ilovitsh A, Leach JK, Dumont E, Caskey CF, Ferrara KW. Phys Med Biol; 2017 May 21; 62(10):4083-4106. PubMed ID: 28426437 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Influence of Vibration Waveform on MR Elastography]. Tanaka M, Numano T, Habe T, Ito D, Maeno T, Ueki T, Igarashi K, Mizuhara K. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2019 May 21; 75(3):239-246. PubMed ID: 30890671 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Simultaneous magnetic resonance and optical elastography acquisitions: Comparison of displacement images and shear modulus estimations using a single vibration source. Brinker ST, Kearney SP, Royston TJ, Klatt D. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Aug 21; 84():135-144. PubMed ID: 29775815 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. External vibration multi-directional ultrasound shearwave elastography (EVMUSE): application in liver fibrosis staging. Zhao H, Song P, Meixner DD, Kinnick RR, Callstrom MR, Sanchez W, Urban MW, Manduca A, Greenleaf JF, Chen S. IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2014 Nov 21; 33(11):2140-8. PubMed ID: 25020066 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic resonance shear wave elastography using transient acoustic radiation force excitations and sinusoidal displacement encoding. Hofstetter LW, Odéen H, Bolster BD, Christensen DA, Payne A, Parker DL. Phys Med Biol; 2021 Feb 26; 66(5):. PubMed ID: 33352538 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of ultrasound elastography, magnetic resonance elastography and finite element model to quantify nonlinear shear modulus. Pagé G, Bied M, Garteiser P, Van Beers B, Etaix N, Fraschini C, Bel-Brunon A, Gennisson JL. Phys Med Biol; 2023 Oct 02; 68(20):. PubMed ID: 37703895 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of viscosity estimation for oil-in-gelatin phantom in shear wave based ultrasound elastography. Zhu Y, Dong C, Yin Y, Chen X, Guo Y, Zheng Y, Shen Y, Wang T, Zhang X, Chen S. Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Feb 02; 41(2):601-9. PubMed ID: 25542484 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A Scholte wave approach for ultrasonic surface acoustic wave elastography. Liu J, Leer J, Aglayomov SR, Emelianov SY. Med Phys; 2023 Jul 02; 50(7):4138-4150. PubMed ID: 36971512 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional analysis of shear wave propagation observed by in vivo magnetic resonance elastography of the brain. Hamhaber U, Sack I, Papazoglou S, Rump J, Klatt D, Braun J. Acta Biomater; 2007 Jan 02; 3(1):127-37. PubMed ID: 17067861 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. An automatic differentiation-based gradient method for inversion of the shear wave equation in magnetic resonance elastography: specific application in fibrous soft tissues. Chatelin S, Charpentier I, Corbin N, Meylheuc L, Vappou J. Phys Med Biol; 2016 Jul 07; 61(13):5000-19. PubMed ID: 27300107 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Mechanical transient-based magnetic resonance elastography. McCracken PJ, Manduca A, Felmlee J, Ehman RL. Magn Reson Med; 2005 Mar 07; 53(3):628-39. PubMed ID: 15723406 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Measuring shear-wave speed with point shear-wave elastography and MR elastography: a phantom study. Kishimoto R, Suga M, Koyama A, Omatsu T, Tachibana Y, Ebner DK, Obata T. BMJ Open; 2017 Jan 05; 7(1):e013925. PubMed ID: 28057657 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Diffraction-biased shear wave fields generated with longitudinal magnetic resonance elastography drivers. Yin M, Rouvière O, Glaser KJ, Ehman RL. Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jul 05; 26(6):770-80. PubMed ID: 18467059 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Observation of nonlinear shear wave propagation using magnetic resonance elastography. Sack I, McGowan CK, Samani A, Luginbuhl C, Oakden W, Plewes DB. Magn Reson Med; 2004 Oct 05; 52(4):842-50. PubMed ID: 15389935 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]