These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

778 related items for PubMed ID: 28434679

  • 1. Effect of fabrication stages and cementation on the marginal fit of CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia crowns.
    Kale E, Yilmaz B, Seker E, Özcelik TB.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Dec; 118(6):736-741. PubMed ID: 28434679
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effect of cement space on the marginal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated monolithic zirconia crowns.
    Kale E, Seker E, Yilmaz B, Özcelik TB.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Dec; 116(6):890-895. PubMed ID: 27460314
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Marginal fit of CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated by using cone beam computed tomography scans.
    Kale E, Cilli M, Özçelik TB, Yilmaz B.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 May; 123(5):731-737. PubMed ID: 31653403
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. In vitro evaluation of marginal discrepancy of monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated with different CAD-CAM systems.
    Hamza TA, Sherif RM.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jun; 117(6):762-766. PubMed ID: 27836145
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effect of cementation and aging on the marginal fit of veneered and monolithic zirconia and metal-ceramic CAD-CAM crowns.
    Del Piñal M, Lopez-Suarez C, Bartolome JF, Volpato CA, Suarez MJ.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):323.e1-323.e7. PubMed ID: 33176924
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. An in vitro evaluation of marginal fit zirconia crowns fabricated by a CAD-CAM dental laboratory and a milling center.
    Meirowitz A, Bitterman Y, Levy S, Mijiritsky E, Dolev E.
    BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jun 13; 19(1):103. PubMed ID: 31196041
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Marginal discrepancy of monolithic and veneered all-ceramic crowns on titanium and zirconia implant abutments before and after adhesive cementation: a scanning electron microscopy analysis.
    Martinez-Rus F, Ferreiroa A, Ozcan M, Pradies G.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013 Jun 13; 28(2):480-7. PubMed ID: 23527350
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of the marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide crowns in preparations with two different finish lines.
    Euán R, Figueras-Álvarez O, Cabratosa-Termes J, Brufau-de Barberà M, Gomes-Azevedo S.
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun 13; 21(4):291-5. PubMed ID: 22372886
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of marginal fit between CAD-CAM and hot-press lithium disilicate crowns.
    Dolev E, Bitterman Y, Meirowitz A.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan 13; 121(1):124-128. PubMed ID: 29961628
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effect of feldspathic porcelain layering on the marginal fit of zirconia and titanium complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
    Yilmaz B, Alshahrani FA, Kale E, Johnston WM.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul 13; 120(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 29426786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Digital evaluation of the fit of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate crowns with a new three-dimensional approach.
    Zimmermann M, Valcanaia A, Neiva G, Mehl A, Fasbinder D.
    Quintessence Int; 2018 Jul 13; 49(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 29192293
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Three-Dimensional Digital Evaluation of the Fit of Endocrowns Fabricated from Different CAD/CAM Materials.
    Zimmermann M, Valcanaia A, Neiva G, Mehl A, Fasbinder D.
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb 13; 28(2):e504-e509. PubMed ID: 29508488
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology.
    Batson ER, Cooper LF, Duqum I, Mendonça G.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct 13; 112(4):770-7. PubMed ID: 24980739
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Marginal and internal fit of curved anterior CAD/CAM-milled zirconia fixed dental prostheses: an in-vitro study.
    Büchi DL, Ebler S, Hämmerle CH, Sailer I.
    Quintessence Int; 2014 Oct 13; 45(10):837-46. PubMed ID: 25126636
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Influence of glazing and aging on the marginal, axial, axio-occlusal, and occlusal fit of 3-unit monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated using additive and subtractive techniques.
    Toksoy D, Önöral Ö.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr 13; 131(4):658.e1-658.e9. PubMed ID: 38342643
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods.
    Ng J, Ruse D, Wyatt C.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep 13; 112(3):555-60. PubMed ID: 24630399
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Marginal Discrepancies of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns: The Influence of Preparation Designs and Sintering Techniques.
    Ahmed WM, Abdallah MN, McCullagh AP, Wyatt CCL, Troczynski T, Carvalho RM.
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Mar 13; 28(3):288-298. PubMed ID: 30656786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 39.