These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

527 related items for PubMed ID: 28436308

  • 1. The different effects of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) and sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) on mandibular border movement.
    Komori H, Kawanabe N, Kataoka T, Kato Y, Fujisawa A, Yamashiro T, Kamioka H.
    Cranio; 2018 Jul; 36(4):228-233. PubMed ID: 28436308
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparisons of Jaw Line and Face Line after Mandibular Setback: Intraoral Vertical Ramus versus Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomies.
    Chen CM, Tseng YC, Ko EC, Chen MY, Chen KJ, Cheng JH.
    Biomed Res Int; 2018 Jul; 2018():1375085. PubMed ID: 30662900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Surgical morbidities of sagittal split ramus osteotomy versus intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for the correction of mandibular prognathism: a randomized clinical trial.
    Leung YY, Wang R, Wong NSM, Li DTS, Au SW, Choi WS, Su YX.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Jul; 50(7):933-939. PubMed ID: 33168369
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Postoperative stability of two common ramus osteotomy procedures for the correction of mandibular prognathism: A randomized controlled trial.
    Li DTS, Wang R, Wong NSM, Leung YY.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2022 Jan; 50(1):32-39. PubMed ID: 34627665
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of the quality of life changes of patients receiving sagittal split ramus osteotomy or intraoral vertical subsigmoid osteotomy for mandibular prognathism.
    Wong NSM, Leung YY.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Apr; 27(4):1435-1448. PubMed ID: 36881158
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Retrospective study of changes in the sensitivity of the oral mucosa: sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) versus intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO).
    Hasegawa T, Tateishi C, Asai M, Imai Y, Okamoto N, Shioyasono A, Kimoto A, Akashi M, Suzuki H, Furudoi S, Komori T.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 44(3):349-55. PubMed ID: 25468631
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of the skeletal stability after mandibular counter-clockwise rotation in three surgical procedures.
    Narahara S, Morita Y, Shido R, Yoshida N, Ohba S.
    Odontology; 2024 Apr; 112(2):640-646. PubMed ID: 37880466
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Condylar and temporomandibular joint disc positions after mandibular osteotomy for prognathism.
    Ueki K, Marukawa K, Nakagawa K, Yamamoto E.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Dec; 60(12):1424-32; discussion 1432-4. PubMed ID: 12465004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Assessment of skeletal stability of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy with one-day maxillary-mandibular fixation followed by early jaw exercise.
    Ohba S, Tasaki H, Tobita T, Minamizato T, Kawasaki T, Motooka N, Watanabe E, Yoshida N, Asahina I.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Oct; 41(7):586-92. PubMed ID: 23347885
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Stability of pre-orthodontic orthognathic surgery depending on mandibular surgical techniques: SSRO vs IVRO.
    Choi SH, Yoo HJ, Lee JY, Jung YS, Choi JW, Lee KJ.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Sep; 44(9):1209-15. PubMed ID: 27524382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Variation of plate fixation for mandibular advancement with intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy using endoscopically assisted intraoral rigid or semi-rigid internal fixation: Case series study: Postoperative condylar seating control for mandibular advancement.
    Hara S, Mitsugi M, Tatemoto Y.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Dec; 43(10):2012-6. PubMed ID: 26610634
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Does mandibular osteotomy affect gonial angle in patients with class III deformity? Vertical ramus osteotomy versus sagittal split osteotomy.
    Tabrizi R, Pakshir H, Behnia H, Akhlaghi S, Shahsavari N.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Aug; 45(8):992-6. PubMed ID: 27012604
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Positional changes of the mandibular condyle in unilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy combined with intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for asymmetric class III malocclusion.
    Park J, Hong KE, Yun JE, Shin ES, Kim CH, Kim BJ, Kim JH.
    J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Oct 31; 47(5):373-381. PubMed ID: 34713812
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 27.