These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Comparison of the quality of life changes of patients receiving sagittal split ramus osteotomy or intraoral vertical subsigmoid osteotomy for mandibular prognathism. Wong NSM, Leung YY. Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Apr; 27(4):1435-1448. PubMed ID: 36881158 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Transitional joint effusion in the mandibular prognathic surgery patient: intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy versus sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Nishimura M, Segami N, Sato J, Honjou M, Fujimura K. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 May; 62(5):545-8. PubMed ID: 15122556 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Retrospective study of changes in the sensitivity of the oral mucosa: sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) versus intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO). Hasegawa T, Tateishi C, Asai M, Imai Y, Okamoto N, Shioyasono A, Kimoto A, Akashi M, Suzuki H, Furudoi S, Komori T. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 44(3):349-55. PubMed ID: 25468631 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Change in condylar long axis and skeletal stability following sagittal split ramus osteotomy and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathia. Ueki K, Marukawa K, Shimada M, Nakagawa K, Yamamoto E. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Oct; 63(10):1494-9. PubMed ID: 16182918 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of osseous healing after sagittal split ramus osteotomy and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy. Rokutanda S, Yamada S, Yanamoto S, Omori K, Fujimura Y, Morita Y, Rokutanda H, Kohara H, Fujishita A, Nakamura T, Yoshimi T, Yoshida N, Umeda M. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Oct; 47(10):1316-1321. PubMed ID: 29843949 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Condylar and temporomandibular joint disc positions after mandibular osteotomy for prognathism. Ueki K, Marukawa K, Nakagawa K, Yamamoto E. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Dec; 60(12):1424-32; discussion 1432-4. PubMed ID: 12465004 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of skeletal stability of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy with one-day maxillary-mandibular fixation followed by early jaw exercise. Ohba S, Tasaki H, Tobita T, Minamizato T, Kawasaki T, Motooka N, Watanabe E, Yoshida N, Asahina I. J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Oct; 41(7):586-92. PubMed ID: 23347885 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Changes in the temporomandibular joint after mandibular setback surgery in monkeys: intraoral vertical versus sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Zhao Q, Hu J, Wang D, Zhu S. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Sep; 104(3):329-37. PubMed ID: 17428700 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Variation of plate fixation for mandibular advancement with intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy using endoscopically assisted intraoral rigid or semi-rigid internal fixation: Case series study: Postoperative condylar seating control for mandibular advancement. Hara S, Mitsugi M, Tatemoto Y. J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Dec; 43(10):2012-6. PubMed ID: 26610634 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Vertical ramus versus sagittal split osteotomies: comparison of stability after mandibular setback. Yoshioka I, Khanal A, Tominaga K, Horie A, Furuta N, Fukuda J. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jun; 66(6):1138-44. PubMed ID: 18486778 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Does mandibular osteotomy affect gonial angle in patients with class III deformity? Vertical ramus osteotomy versus sagittal split osteotomy. Tabrizi R, Pakshir H, Behnia H, Akhlaghi S, Shahsavari N. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Aug; 45(8):992-6. PubMed ID: 27012604 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of different treatment procedures on the temporomandibular joint after mandibular setback in skeletal class III - A retrospective study. Ohba S, Tominaga J, Shido R, Koga T, Yamamoto H, Zaiima H, Yoshida N, Asahina I. J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2022 Sep; 50(9):712-718. PubMed ID: 35987801 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]