These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
45. Dual-energy CT quantitative parameters for evaluating Immunohistochemical biomarkers of invasive breast cancer. Wang X, Liu D, Zeng X, Jiang S, Li L, Yu T, Zhang J. Cancer Imaging; 2021 Jan 07; 21(1):4. PubMed ID: 33413654 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Preliminary study on the differentiation between parapelvic cyst and hydronephrosis with non-calculous using only pre-contrast dual-energy spectral CT scans. Han D, Ma G, Wei L, Ren C, Zhou J, Shen C, He T. Br J Radiol; 2017 May 07; 90(1073):20160632. PubMed ID: 28281789 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. [(18)F]FDG-PET standard uptake value as a metabolic predictor of bone marrow response to radiation: impact on acute and late hematological toxicity in cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiation therapy. Elicin O, Callaway S, Prior JO, Bourhis J, Ozsahin M, Herrera FG. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Dec 01; 90(5):1099-107. PubMed ID: 25442041 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Performance Evaluation of Material Decomposition With Rapid-Kilovoltage-Switching Dual-Energy CT and Implications for Assessing Bone Mineral Density. Wait JM, Cody D, Jones AK, Rong J, Baladandayuthapani V, Kappadath SC. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jun 01; 204(6):1234-41. PubMed ID: 26001233 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Dual-source dual-energy CT evaluation of complex cystic renal masses. Ascenti G, Mazziotti S, Mileto A, Racchiusa S, Donato R, Settineri N, Gaeta M. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Nov 01; 199(5):1026-34. PubMed ID: 23096175 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Quantitative parameter analysis of pretreatment dual-energy computed tomography in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cervical lymph node characteristics and prediction of radiotherapy sensitivity. Li Z, Li C, Li L, Yang D, Wang S, Song J, Jiang M, Kang M. Radiat Oncol; 2024 Jun 26; 19(1):81. PubMed ID: 38918834 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Pearls, Pitfalls, and Problems in Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Imaging of the Body. Wortman JR, Sodickson AD. Radiol Clin North Am; 2018 Jul 26; 56(4):625-640. PubMed ID: 29936951 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Clinical value of dual-energy spectral imaging with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction for reducing contrast medium dose in CT portal venography: in comparison with standard 120-kVp imaging protocol. Ma CL, Chen XX, Lei YX, Zhang XR, Jia YJ, Tian X, Tian Q. Br J Radiol; 2016 Jun 26; 89(1062):20151022. PubMed ID: 27031376 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. A Single Enhanced Dual-Energy CT Scan May Distinguish Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma From Adenocarcinoma During the Venous phase. Zhang Z, Zou H, Yuan A, Jiang F, Zhao B, Liu Y, Chen J, Zuo M, Gong L. Acad Radiol; 2020 May 26; 27(5):624-629. PubMed ID: 31447258 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Dual-energy, standard and low-kVp contrast-enhanced CT-cholangiography: a comparative analysis of image quality and radiation exposure. Stiller W, Schwarzwaelder CB, Sommer CM, Veloza S, Radeleff BA, Kauczor HU. Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul 26; 81(7):1405-12. PubMed ID: 21458939 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Dual energy computed tomography analysis in cancer patients: What factors affect iodine concentration in contrast enhanced studies? Corrias G, Sawan P, Mahmood U, Zheng J, Capanu M, Salvatore M, Spinato G, Saba L, Mannelli L. Eur J Radiol; 2019 Nov 26; 120():108698. PubMed ID: 31600640 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]