These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
284 related items for PubMed ID: 28449835
1. The Gap Between Manual and Automated Office Blood Pressure Measurements Results at a Hypertension Clinic. Rinfret F, Cloutier L, L'Archevêque H, Gauthier M, Laskine M, Larochelle P, Ilinca M, Birnbaum L, Ng Cheong N, Wistaff R, Van Nguyen P, Roederer G, Bertrand M, Lamarre-Cliche M. Can J Cardiol; 2017 May; 33(5):653-657. PubMed ID: 28449835 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. How do family physicians measure blood pressure in routine clinical practice? National survey of Canadian family physicians. Kaczorowski J, Myers MG, Gelfer M, Dawes M, Mang EJ, Berg A, Grande CD, Kljujic D. Can Fam Physician; 2017 Mar; 63(3):e193-e199. PubMed ID: 28292817 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Conventional versus automated measurement of blood pressure in the office (CAMBO) trial. Myers MG, Godwin M, Dawes M, Kiss A, Tobe SW, Kaczorowski J. Fam Pract; 2012 Aug; 29(4):376-82. PubMed ID: 22117083 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Automated office versus home measurement of blood pressure in the assessment of morning hypertension. Andreadis EA, Angelopoulos ET, Tsakanikas AP, Agaliotis GD, Kravvariti SD, Mousoulis GP. Blood Press Monit; 2012 Feb; 17(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 22218221 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Unfounded concerns about the use of automated office blood pressure measurement in SPRINT. Myers MG, Campbell NR. J Am Soc Hypertens; 2016 Dec; 10(12):903-905. PubMed ID: 27863819 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Preference of blood pressure measurement methods by primary care doctors in Hong Kong: a cross-sectional survey. Lee EKP, Choi RCM, Liu L, Gao T, Yip BHK, Wong SYS. BMC Fam Pract; 2020 May 26; 21(1):95. PubMed ID: 32456619 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Why use automated office blood pressure measurements in clinical practice? Andreadis EA, Angelopoulos ET, Agaliotis GD, Tsakanikas AP, Mousoulis GP. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev; 2011 Sep 01; 18(3):89-91. PubMed ID: 21950780 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Different Automated Office Blood Pressure Measurement Devices: Evidence of Nonequivalence and Clinical Implications. Rinfret F, Cloutier L, Wistaff R, Birnbaum LM, Ng Cheong N, Laskine M, Roederer G, Van Nguyen P, Bertrand M, Rabasa-Lhoret R, Dufour R, Lamarre-Cliche M. Can J Cardiol; 2017 Dec 01; 33(12):1639-1644. PubMed ID: 29173603 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The great myth of office blood pressure measurement. Myers MG. J Hypertens; 2012 Oct 01; 30(10):1894-8. PubMed ID: 22871894 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Are Automated Office Blood Pressure Readings More Variable Than Home Readings? Myers MG, Kaczorowski J. Hypertension; 2020 May 01; 75(5):1179-1183. PubMed ID: 32200678 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Automated office blood pressure measurement in primary care. Myers MG, Kaczorowski J, Dawes M, Godwin M. Can Fam Physician; 2014 Feb 01; 60(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 24522674 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of an automated sphygmomanometer for use in the office setting. Myers MG, Valdivieso M. Blood Press Monit; 2012 Jun 01; 17(3):116-9. PubMed ID: 22514038 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]