These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. Minimally invasive treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with a novel interspinous spacer. Shabat S, Miller LE, Block JE, Gepstein R. Clin Interv Aging; 2011 Aug; 6():227-33. PubMed ID: 21966217 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Aperius interspinous implant versus open surgical decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis. Postacchini R, Ferrari E, Cinotti G, Menchetti PP, Postacchini F. Spine J; 2011 Oct; 11(10):933-9. PubMed ID: 22005077 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Superion(®) InterSpinous Spacer for treatment of moderate degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: durable three-year results of a randomized controlled trial. Patel VV, Nunley PD, Whang PG, Haley TR, Bradley WD, Davis RP, Block JE, Geisler FH. J Pain Res; 2015 Oct; 8():657-62. PubMed ID: 26491369 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Interspinous Process Decompression: Expanding Treatment Options for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. Nunley PD, Shamie AN, Blumenthal SL, Orndorff D, Block JE, Geisler FH. Biomed Res Int; 2016 Oct; 2016():3267307. PubMed ID: 27819001 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness and Safety of Interspinous Process Decompression (Superion). Cairns K, Deer T, Sayed D, van Noort K, Liang K. Pain Med; 2019 Dec 01; 20(Suppl 2):S2-S8. PubMed ID: 31808529 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Study of percutaneous lumbar decompression and treatment algorithm for patients suffering from neurogenic claudication. Deer TR, Kim CK, Bowman RG, Ranson MT, Yee BS. Pain Physician; 2012 Dec 01; 15(6):451-60. PubMed ID: 23159960 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Are There Differences Between Patients with Extreme Stenosis and Non-extreme Stenosis in Terms of Pain, Function or Complications After Spinal Decompression Using a Tubular Retractor System? Kulkarni AG, Das S, Kunder TS. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Feb 01; 478(2):348-356. PubMed ID: 31633587 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Can low-grade spondylolisthesis be effectively treated by either coflex interlaminar stabilization or laminectomy and posterior spinal fusion? Two-year clinical and radiographic results from the randomized, prospective, multicenter US investigational device exemption trial: clinical article. Davis R, Auerbach JD, Bae H, Errico TJ. J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Aug 01; 19(2):174-84. PubMed ID: 23725394 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Two-Year Evaluation of the X-STOP Interspinous Spacer in Different Primary Patient Populations With Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication Because of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. Hartjen CA, Resnick DK, Hsu KY, Zucherman JF, Hsu EH, Skidmore GA. Clin Spine Surg; 2016 Aug 01; 29(7):305-11. PubMed ID: 23168396 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term results of percutaneous lumbar decompression mild(®) for spinal stenosis. Mekhail N, Vallejo R, Coleman MH, Benyamin RM. Pain Pract; 2012 Mar 01; 12(3):184-93. PubMed ID: 21676166 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. MiDAS ENCORE: Randomized Controlled Study Design and Protocol. Benyamin RM, Staats PS. Pain Physician; 2015 Mar 01; 18(4):307-16. PubMed ID: 26218933 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of two FDA-approved interspinous spacers for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: Superion versus X-STOP-a meta-analysis from five randomized controlled trial studies. Zhao H, Duan LJ, Gao YS, Yang YD, Zhao DY, Tang XS, Hu ZG, Li CH, Chen SX, Liu T, Yu X. J Orthop Surg Res; 2018 Mar 02; 13(1):42. PubMed ID: 29499734 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Interspinous spacer implant in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: preliminary results of a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Miller LE, Block JE. Pain Res Treat; 2012 Mar 02; 2012():823509. PubMed ID: 22448323 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]