These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
336 related items for PubMed ID: 28485692
1. Cost-effectiveness of denosumab versus zoledronic acid for preventing skeletal-related events in the Czech Republic. Cristino J, Finek J, Jandova P, Kolek M, Pásztor B, Giannopoulou C, Qian Y, Brezina T, Lothgren M. J Med Econ; 2017 Aug; 20(8):799-812. PubMed ID: 28485692 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A cost-effectiveness analysis of denosumab for the prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with multiple myeloma in the United States of America. Raje N, Roodman GD, Willenbacher W, Shimizu K, García-Sanz R, Terpos E, Kennedy L, Sabatelli L, Intorcia M, Hechmati G. J Med Econ; 2018 May; 21(5):525-536. PubMed ID: 29480139 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Economic evaluation of denosumab compared with zoledronic acid in hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients with bone metastases. Xie J, Namjoshi M, Wu EQ, Parikh K, Diener M, Yu AP, Guo A, Culver KW. J Manag Care Pharm; 2011 Oct; 17(8):621-43. PubMed ID: 21942303 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Zoledronic acid: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in the management of bone metastases. McKeage K, Plosker GL. Pharmacoeconomics; 2008 Dec 10; 26(3):251-68. PubMed ID: 18282018 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A cost-effectiveness analysis of denosumab for the prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with multiple myeloma in four European countries: Austria, Belgium, Greece, and Italy. Terpos E, Jamotte A, Christodoulopoulou A, Campioni M, Bhowmik D, Kennedy L, Willenbacher W. J Med Econ; 2019 Aug 10; 22(8):766-776. PubMed ID: 30969797 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Pharmacoeconomics of bisphosphonates for skeletal-related event prevention in metastatic non-breast solid tumours. Carter JA, Joshi AD, Kaura S, Botteman MF. Pharmacoeconomics; 2012 May 10; 30(5):373-86. PubMed ID: 22500986 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness of oral ibandronate compared with intravenous (i.v.) zoledronic acid or i.v. generic pamidronate in breast cancer patients with metastatic bone disease undergoing i.v. chemotherapy. De Cock E, Hutton J, Canney P, Body JJ, Barrett-Lee P, Neary MP, Lewis G. Support Care Cancer; 2005 Dec 10; 13(12):975-86. PubMed ID: 15871033 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost effectiveness of zoledronic acid in the management of skeletal metastases in hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients in France, Germany, Portugal, and the Netherlands. Carter JA, Joshi A, Kaura S, Botteman MF. J Med Econ; 2011 Dec 10; 14(3):288-98. PubMed ID: 21469915 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, and economic evaluation, of denosumab for the treatment of bone metastases from solid tumours. Ford J, Cummins E, Sharma P, Elders A, Stewart F, Johnston R, Royle P, Jones R, Mulatero C, Todd R, Mowatt G. Health Technol Assess; 2013 Jul 10; 17(29):1-386. PubMed ID: 23870108 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness of denosumab versus oral alendronate for elderly osteoporotic women in Japan. Mori T, Crandall CJ, Ganz DA. Osteoporos Int; 2017 May 10; 28(5):1733-1744. PubMed ID: 28210776 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness analysis of once-yearly injection of zoledronic acid for the treatment of osteoporosis in Japan. Moriwaki K, Mouri M, Hagino H. Osteoporos Int; 2017 Jun 10; 28(6):1939-1950. PubMed ID: 28265718 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]